Posted on 04/13/2009 10:02:53 PM PDT by ebiskit
Why did they release this document? Did they intend for it to be released publically? If so, then they did it on purpose to really cause fear and to silence people who aren't and wouldn't have any desire to associate with the true extremist "skinhead" "neo-Nazi" types.
This document, if authentic, is a threat - and a sinister device to stop freedom of speech.
Just about every conservative value is mentioned in this document. In other words, we are all extremists and need to be watched and silenced.
And it encourages Americans to become citizen tattle-tales.
And I wonder if release of this document isn't a ploy to force something to come to a head. Now I'm afraid some whacko group or individual will see this and do something violently stupid.
I believe it needs to be passed out at every tea party along with some trenchant commentary.
I guess it is. I received a call from the RNSC this morning; basically I said until the GOP finds a backbone don’t call me again.
Do you have a Bible in your house?
You might be a Right Wing Extremist!
Let me ask you. You say they cannot be allowed to fail but they are failing even as you said after the bailout. So what did bailout do? Are you willing to give them as much as they need forever as they continue to fail? We will as obama likes to say, sacrifice now, and we will sacrifice later along with our children. Only to be hit again in the same fashion when greed and power take over. Why not? Government won't let them fail.
I know the prince was a shareholder. My point is he had the money to bail the company out. He was called many times to ask what needed to be done with taxpayer money. This is a man who blames us for 9/11.
"At times like this one, we must address some of the issues that led to such a criminal attack," alwaleed said. "I believe the government of the United States of America should re-examine its policies in the Middle East and adopt a more balanced stance towards the Palestinian cause."
The draw down I mentioned was what started the crisis. I am positive of that. Had that not happened where would be? If the finely scripted overtures of henny penny the sky is falling where would we be? You know where? Right where we are now. We will take over bad debts among giving them more money. What if we just took over bad debts in the first place like McCain mentioned during the campaign? Oh noooooooooo, obama said that was a horrible idea.
Here in WSJ today.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123966939766015517.html
To socialize the American economy, it is not necessary to nationalize every business in the United States. All it requires is to put the corporations that control the finances of all of the companies in the economy under government control. And that is what is happening now.
Barney and obama were pushing for regulations on CEO pay way before the crisis. The crisis did not go wasted as Rahm says.
http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/11037327/c_11036422
April 11, 2008
"This isn't just about expressing outrage," Obama reportedly said in prepared remarks. "It's about changing a system where bad behavior is rewarded so that we can hold CEOs accountable, and make sure they're acting in a way that's good for their company, good for our economy, and good for America, not just good for themselves."
It's like deja vu. We have heard these words not so long ago. Obama found a way to get this done through crisis. This was all planned. Yes, they should have failed.
“I received a call from the RNSC this morning; basically I said until the GOP finds a backbone don’t call me again.”
Good.
This sort of assessment could only be rationalized if conservative pages were filled with references to loading up on ammunition and promoting Civil War and secession. You know, real Timothy McVeigh crap.
Maybe in McVeigh's stupid mind, but what he did will never be acceptable in mine.
So my bride, baby daughter, Carin terrier, and myself are all right wing extremists.
Seems that DHS will have their hands full.
lol All those mil manuals on propaganda and disinformation and crowd control and so forth, point both ways!
In the final analysis this is more of an attempt to scare honest, non-violent conservatives while at the same time trying to trigger actual nuts that are on the edge.
Sometimes when analyzing a network, you introduce a known stimulus then sit back and read the traffic.
Where does your stimulus info go, who gets it first, what are the flow channels? Who is the boss, who is respected, who never gets it. The net can be shaped out.
Then you can pay attention to what people in the net say about your little goose- “FMDCH-BITS!!!!” and “Molon Labe” being the milder responses you’d be interested in.
Every admin uses these techniques on the US people, it’s just easier now that so many are web connected.
One of my role models was Edward Bernays. Among many things in his long career, he worked with the USGovt during WWII on propaganda and public perception, and consensus shaping. He helped us win the war by pulling people together behind the effort. They did things like this case, ring the bell and listen to it ring.
Authentic or not - someone or some group is using a sinister means to quell free speech, to make some people have second thoughts about attending a tea party, to instigate a violent activity in order to completely demonize ALL conservatives, Republicans, Christians, liberatarians, anyone who does not agree with a socialist, statist, leftist, communist agenda.
Bookmark
The answer is obvious.
"One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."
Cheers!
It likely was, at least in part. He's often hired as an "expert" consultant.
Of course that's sort of like hiring someone who once set off a bottle rocket as your expert "rocket scientist".
Placemark bump! Good thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.