Let me guess, by reviewing your posting history, you are a Mormon, correct?
Trolling for the Mittster are we?
No, not a Mormon, never been a Mormon, have no relatives or close friends who are Mormon, never been to Utah. Mitt would be light years better than Sarah, of course, because he’s an experienced executive who has demonstrated substantial success in both the public and private sectors. But, excepting Edwards and Kerry who are amoral buffoons, pretty much all the early Republican and Democratic contenders for the Presidential nomination have a lot more to recommend them for the job than Sarah Palin. Even Hillary, who I absolutely abhor, but at least she knows how to get things done, and when push comes to shove and al Qaeda is fixing to lob smallpox bombs at us or North Korea is fixing to lob nukes at us, she’d prioritize saving her own and her rich pals’ skins and head off the problem. Sarah “I can see Russia from Alaska” Palin would just panic and hope some of the Senators could figure out what to do.
The notion that only Mormons could support Mitt Romney is ludicrous. We had pretty slim pickings for Presidential nominees in 2008 (both Rs and Ds), and he certainly stood out as someone who was well-qualified and also unlikely to sprout distractions like babies spawned with bimbos or interns giving him blow jobs in the Oval Office . . . or toting the likes of Levi Johnston on stage with him at the national convention.