[Filo]

I have ready plenty of books purporting to demonstrate the validity of neo-Darwoodian ToE. In the end, all of them unwittingly provided yet more evidence for Creation/ID. You can’t be too careful if you’re a Darwinist. But again, let’s see your evidence in favor of Charlie’s fanciful creation myth. If the NDToE is so overwhelming, it shouldn’t be too much trouble

Read but failed to understand. I see.

There isn't much trouble involved but whatever effort I make would be wasted.

Your "mind" is made up and your mental barriers to knowledge and evidence are readily apparent.

[GodGunsGuts]

Except my mind is backed up by evidence, whereas your mind is made up in favor of an increasingly discredited “theory” based on a “dearth” of evidence, that has only gotten worse for Darwood’s fanciful creation myth (not better!) with the passage of time.