Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chris Dodd's Personal Bailout
Mother Jones ^ | April 16, 2009 | Jonathan Stein and Daniel Schulman

Posted on 04/16/2009 9:39:13 PM PDT by Lorianne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: Political Junkie Too; BillyBoy

“National blocs couldn’t afford to fund all the state legislative offices”

They wouldn’t have to, just key races, and yes they could and would and do buy influence in state legislatures too.

“State campaigns will employ state people, the money will be gotten from people with state interests, and the attention will draw in real grass-roots people”

? That sounds like a strange fantasy. The more arcane it gets the more corrupt it would be, that’s how it works in reality. 150 people appointing an official as powerful as a US Senator is a terrible idea.


41 posted on 04/19/2009 10:26:25 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
"If I may be so bold as to put words into your mouth, it sounds like you are saying that you would rather live with the evil you choose and all the money in the electoral process, rather than eliminating the money and living with the evil that your chosen representatives choose."

If I thought for a moment your theory would work, I'd support it. I don't, because it would make yet another important set of offices unaccountable to the electorate. There's a reason why many fought to give the people the right to choose Senators via the popular vote.

"I would say that my choice is to take power away from Washington and bring it closer to home, to the States, which should have been the dominant governments for the people."

But, again, you're not returning it to the people. You're giving the legislature more power and taking away an important choice FROM the people. I don't trust my state legislators with that power. My State Rep is a crook and my State Senator is a Justice Department-protected member who is unaccountable to anyone that doesn't share the same skin color (and doesn't do bubkas for those that happen to). The Congressmember is in a gerrymandered Democrat district where a Republican hasn't been elected since U.S. Grant's 2nd term in 1872. I'm already disenfranchised. Those 2 U.S. Senator votes are, along with the Presidency and Governorship, the ONLY races for which I have a say. I do not want that taken away from me.

42 posted on 04/19/2009 10:28:37 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson