Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Editorial: Consider costs of environmental edicts
OC Register ^ | 4/20/09 | Editorial

Posted on 04/20/2009 9:44:17 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

There's potentially good news on the environmental front out of Washington D.C., but it's probably more than offset by a devastating announcement Friday.

First, the good news. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that the Environmental Protection Agency, when upgrading older power plants, may consider costs before demanding use of the most advanced technology, as required by law. The ruling was a defeat for environmentalists, who challenged the Bush administration's discretionary practice.

Hans Bader, special projects counsel for the Competitive Enterprise Institute think tank, told us the ruling permits continued cost-benefit analysis as an option in upgrades .. The group sued under the Clean Water Act's requirement that upgrades must include "the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact."

Water drawn from U.S. waterways to cool power-plant machinery kills billions of fish and other small aquatic creatures that are crushed against intake screens or sucked into cooling systems. Newer plants with advanced technology reduce the kill rate by 98 percent.

If government required the "best technology available" in every case it would cost $3.5 billion a year, according to the EPA's estimate. ...

The bad news is that the EPA on Friday declared carbon dioxide and five other so-called greenhouse gas emissions to be harmful, under similar discretion provided by a previous high-court ruling. Finding the naturally occurring CO2 harmful gives government the authority to regulate the gas as it does truly harmful air pollutants.

CEI and other free-market advocates had written EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, warning that such a finding would "set the stage for an economic train wreck." .. triggers a rule-making procedure that will affect "1.2 million previously unregulated entities, office buildings, big box stores, enclosed malls, hotels, apartment buildings, even commercial kitchens," said the letter from Marlo Lewis, CEI senior fellow, and others.

(Excerpt) Read more at ocregister.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cei; consider; costs; edicts; environmental

1 posted on 04/20/2009 9:44:17 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; Normandy; ...
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 04/20/2009 9:45:17 AM PDT by steelyourfaith ("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." -Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

“Crap and trade” should be the line in the sand for all Americans.


3 posted on 04/20/2009 9:50:02 AM PDT by Murp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This is great news!

Obama (along with the rest of us) has to stop exhaling now!

Ergo, he has to stop talking!

Yea!


4 posted on 04/20/2009 9:58:51 AM PDT by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

This means that exercise will be regulated and limited. You exhale far more CO2 per minute while exercising.


5 posted on 04/20/2009 10:10:16 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

This means that exercise will be regulated and limited. You exhale far more CO2 per minute while exercising.

one more reason to not start that exercise routine.

Global varming. :-)


6 posted on 04/20/2009 10:24:17 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Can the declaration of carbon (dioxide) as a “dangerous” gas be challenged in court? Its about time we start forcing these cultists to put up or shut up and PROVE their case. Which they can’t do.


7 posted on 04/20/2009 10:36:26 AM PDT by ChinaThreat (3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Just one more thing to thank Nixon for.


8 posted on 04/20/2009 11:10:31 AM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson