The productive fields of biology have nothing to do with Darwood’s fanciful creation myth. Although, I have noticed that God’s creation forces productive scientists to use the language of design. This reality has so enraged Richard Darwkins that he’s trying to invent a whole new vocabulary so scientists can avoid using the language of design when they report on God’s creation!
Romans 1:20
I am in the productive field of Biology. The information we use in our work is informed by biological evolution.
Trying to understand biology without evolution is like trying to understand the current political situation with no knowledge of history.
Heb 11:1
I googled "Dawkins Vocabulary" but couldn't find a corroborating source for this claim. Help me out?
Darwood.
You know, I'm going to bother you about this until you give me an answer. Referring to Darwin as "Darwood" not only demeans your argument, but demeans you as well. It's childish, and I think you know that.