Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

As more and more shortages set in, environmentalism is rapidly losing its shine.
1 posted on 04/22/2009 3:54:52 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: calcowgirl

ping


2 posted on 04/22/2009 3:55:05 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (Reagan is back, and this time he's a woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan

We should organize a protest where we pelt lawmakers with water balloons.


3 posted on 04/22/2009 3:58:18 PM PDT by counterpunch (Kenya has two presidents. America has Zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan

I think that Tom McClintock is absolutely right. RESIGN now Arnold!!


4 posted on 04/22/2009 3:59:47 PM PDT by pollywog (I will lift mine eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help. My help comes from the Lord...Ps 121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan; afnamvet; ALOHA RONNIE; ambrose; antceecee; atomic_dog; AVNevis; B4Ranch; b9; ...

PING!

McClintock Ping List.
Please freepmail me if you want on or off this list


5 posted on 04/22/2009 4:00:27 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan

McClintock is doing us a favor by raising this issue in this manner. I applaud him.

One of my pet peeves is that Los Angeles hasn’t made an effort to desalinize water for public use. We take water from the North, yet refuse to develop alternative sources.

So while the state gags on the amount of water being taken from the delta or Northern regions, there’s no game plan to increase Southern California water resources.

Just don’t use water is the solution our brilliant leaders have come up with.

Okay, look, desalinization is going to cost more. It may be double what our costs of other water is today. Does that prevent it from being a viable alternative? What if we produced 25% of our needs? That would only bump up the total cost of water by 25%. It would also reduce the strain on the water resources in the north.

Instead of looking for some alternative plan, the state says, “Don’t use water or power.” What kind of idiots are these people. They watch as California is swarmed by a group of people who can’t support themselves, then bitch at all California residents don’t evaporate and go away.

Screw this noise. Pull your heads out LA, Sacramento, and W., D.C. federal officials. You folks are just plain nuts.


9 posted on 04/22/2009 4:13:01 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Pres__ent Obama's own grandmother says he was born in Kenya. She was there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan

Poor Arnold. He thought he got rid of McClintock and now Tome comes back to expose his schemes.

Gotta love it.


10 posted on 04/22/2009 4:14:07 PM PDT by calcowgirl (RECALL Abel Maldonado! - NO on Props 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan
California has adequate water for agriculture and a modest population. It does not have adequate water for high, human population densities and maintenance of natural stream flows and/or preservation of historic delta ecologies.

If California must use its river runoff for historic preservation, then it must also develop new sources of potable water and manage populations. Neither alternative is an easy fix. Desal requires generous amounts of energy and its effluent is toxic to marine life. Population management is usually onerous, even if applied naturally thru gentrification.

12 posted on 04/22/2009 4:38:10 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan

How is $260 million going to alleviate the drought????


13 posted on 04/22/2009 4:39:36 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan

“Among the ideas: Every California household should save 20 gallons of water a day for 20 days as a way to respond to the state’s drought emergency. Suggestions include filling your bathtub halfway or less, turning off the water when brushing your teeth, reducing lawn watering and running the dishwasher only when it’s full.”

This was done by many in California during the droughts of the mid ‘70’s, and then again in the late ‘80’s and yet again in the late ‘90’s. Well it sure looks like we’ve had our share of droughts here in this once great state. And yet our elected officials just can’t seem to get it figured out. Desal plants, more resovoirs and stop allotting so much of our runoff for a fish that’s too weak to swim (it uses the currents of the delta to get from one place to another) and to stupid to find somewhere else to live.

Desal plants are not that expensive now, if they built a couple hundred all up and down the coast it would eliminate the government backed drought. Currently Israel is desalinizing water at a cost of US$0.53 per cubic meter. Singapore is desalinizing water for US$0.49 per cubic meter. In San Diego a mere .46 per cubic meter.

With globull warming melting all the glaciers causing the oceans to rise, these desal plants would offset the oceans rise. (sarc)


14 posted on 04/22/2009 4:39:46 PM PDT by repubpub (If I'm posting here, I must be on Napolitano's list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ElkGroveDan

I wonder how much of the current cross Delta flow is lost due to bad levees? There is so much low hanging fruit.


15 posted on 04/22/2009 7:26:13 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson