Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: airedale
Type Geneva Conventions into your browser, you will get several hits.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Conventions

http://www.genevaconventions.org/

A very large portion of these documents deals with who IS and who IS NOT covered by the Conventions.

Why?

If everyone is covered, why doesn't this treaty simply say, “every living human being on the face of this Earth is covered?”

The truth is, when you argue with an informed liberal, for any length of time, they end up saying something like, “Cheney and the neo-cons carved out exceptions—” Blah Blah Blay -—

They KNOW they do not have the law behind them, at least not yet.

They count on an activist judge or some international Court, even though their case, that their was any “crime” is very weak.

4 posted on 04/25/2009 8:36:11 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Kansas58

The issue isn’t the Geneva Conventions it’s the law passed by congress that the Republicans are hanging their hats on regarding the definition of torture. If the law is what the former WH and its lawyers claim then there will be some real problems for the Dems who voted for it and any case against them.


20 posted on 04/25/2009 9:07:43 AM PDT by airedale ( XZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson