To: csvset; Marysecretary; Nancee; Cicero; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; exit82; Fedora; Yaelle; potlatch; ...
Ironically, the Associated Press used the exact same term here, “apparent suicide,” as it did in its initial story on Vince Foster’s death. We know now that the AP was wrong on Foster. It’s too soon to draw any conclusions on this new case until more details are made available, if and when.
To: justiceseeker93
Yeah. But it took the newsfolks nearly a week to say things like this, "Colleagues had noticed he was under stress and had suggested he take time off," about Vince. Questions about Foster's demeanor only began to arise when so many people expressed surprise at his supposed suicide. ("Don't believe a word you hear. It wasn't suicide. It couldn't have been.")
ML/NJ
55 posted on
05/01/2009 4:20:35 AM PDT by
ml/nj
To: justiceseeker93
JS93—why off yourself at 59? He had a long and lucrative career, and made money hand over fist, both on and off the books.
Maybe he lost it all in the market crashes. Maybe he made overtures to the Clintons about needing money or he would have to spill a few beans.
Then Clinton, Inc. got rid of another possible threat.
Who knows?
All we DO know, is that with the Clintons, the surface story is NEVER the real story.
62 posted on
05/01/2009 6:35:38 AM PDT by
exit82
(The Obama Cabinet: There was more brainpower on Gilligan's Island.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson