Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maelstorm

Is one of the gay men, the bio-Dad?

There is only one person to blame for this, Mommy just valued heroin more than she did her children. So, Mommy is an unfit mother - she can’t dump them on her parents because of health issues. So, do they go to an orphanage, or do they go where they are wanted, will be provided for, will be parents involved - or do we make them wards of the state?

I don’t see where the judge had a whole lot of choice in this matter - and I think the article is missing some KEY factors .... but hey, what do facts matter when they can leave out some key factors and get some emotions fired up?


55 posted on 05/02/2009 10:15:47 PM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Hodar

The health issues are BS. She can in fact dump her kids on her loving parents but evil bureaucrats obstructed this


57 posted on 05/02/2009 10:25:18 PM PDT by dennisw (Your action becomes your habit. Your habit becomes your character, that becomes your destiny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

To: Hodar
Is one of the gay men, the bio-Dad?

Not according to the article. You should read it.

There is only one person to blame for this, Mommy just valued heroin more than she did her children. So, Mommy is an unfit mother - she can’t dump them on her parents because of health issues.

Baloney! A multitude of other people share the blame for this atrocity. The social workers, judges, legislators, and voters of that putrid society all share the blame for forcing this child to be adopted against his family's wishes by a couple of overt sexual deviants.

So, do they go to an orphanage, or do they go where they are wanted, will be provided for, will be parents involved - or do we make them wards of the state?

That is some embarrassingly fallacious reasoning you used there. Your false choice of the boy becoming a ward of the state is a simplistic strawman argument. There are a variety of other options available, first and foremost keeping the child with the family he loves and that loves him.

I don’t see where the judge had a whole lot of choice in this matter - and I think the article is missing some KEY factors ....

This is a silly thing to say for someone who clearly didn't read the article.

but hey, what do facts matter when they can leave out some key factors and get some emotions fired up?

What "other factors" could be more important than the fact the child wants to stay with his family and that they want him to stay with them. Any society that would force a child to be given over to perverts like these deserves to fail.

61 posted on 05/02/2009 10:36:19 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson