Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama using 'code' for judicial activist, Hatch says
The Salt Lake Tribune ^ | May 3, 2009 | Matt Canham

Posted on 05/03/2009 9:19:02 AM PDT by FocusNexus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: FocusNexus

I honestly believe folks on the Hill have sold out their values.

Some might say, “sold their souls to the Devil.”

I think the real hope for America comes from across the fruited plain and not out of DC.


61 posted on 05/03/2009 3:04:58 PM PDT by Winstons Julia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
"I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people's hopes and struggles, as an essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes."

Looks like Obama voters will get judges who want to give them free gas and mortgages after all.

62 posted on 05/03/2009 3:38:08 PM PDT by denydenydeny ("I'm sure this goes against everything you've been taught, but right and wrong do exist"-Dr House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Don’t count your Hatch before he chickens.
Hatch talks tough until it counts. He had his lips so tightly planted on Janet Reno’s ass he talked with a speach impediment.


63 posted on 05/03/2009 3:42:53 PM PDT by metalurgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

“I’m waiting for a leader and I don’t see one.”

On that, we agree!


64 posted on 05/03/2009 4:24:04 PM PDT by FocusNexus ("Good and evil are present in this world, and between the two there can be no compromise." GW Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
Four words to describe Zerobama's ultimate Supreme Court nominee.....SHOVEL-READY ECONOMIC JUSTICE...
65 posted on 05/03/2009 5:29:45 PM PDT by FDNYRHEROES (In just 3 days, the War on Terror became the War on Free Speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus

Orrin Hatch is waste of carbon. He’s sucking the life out of the Republican party.

If Orrin Hatch votes against any of Obama’s nominees I’ll donate $2500 to his next campaign.


66 posted on 05/03/2009 6:03:34 PM PDT by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
"He should appoint somebody who will basically obey the law and not put their own policy preferences into law," Hatch said.

Presumably with a straight face.

67 posted on 05/03/2009 6:42:31 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I seem to remember every MSM outlet on planet earth during the Bush Administration nominations screaming about Bush needing to to appoint someone from the “mainstream”. The silence now is indeed deafening.
68 posted on 05/03/2009 7:18:16 PM PDT by SoCalTransplant (Deeds not Words......dont tell me you are a Republican. Show me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
take VP Joe Biden to task for his horrible treatmen of Clarence Thomas when he deliberaely wrongly tried to portray Mr. Thomas as one who supports judicial activism.

This will be the litmus test by which ALL Obama-Biden bozos are judged. If not, demand that Joe Biden step down and apologize to Justice Thomas.

Senator Biden was the first questioner. Instead of the softball questions he’d promised to ask, he threw a beanball straight at my head, quoting from a speech I’d given four years earlier at the Pacific Legal Foundation and challenging me to defend what I’d said. ”I find attractive the arguments of scholars such as Stephen Macedo, who defend an activist Supreme Court that would strike down laws restricting property rights.” That caught me off guard, and I had no recollection of making so atypical a statement, which shook me up even more. “Now, it would seem to me what you were talking about,” Senator Biden went on to say, “is you find it attractive the fact that they are activists and they would like to strike down existing laws that impact on restricting the use of property rights, because you know, that is what they write about.”

Since I didn’t remember making the statement in the first place, I didn’t know how to respond to it. All I could say in reply was that “it has been some time since I have read Professor Macedo … But I don’t believe that in my writings I have indicated that we should have an activist Supreme Court.” It was, I knew, a weak answer. Fortunately, though, the young lawyers who had helped prepare me for the hearing had loaded all of my speeches into a computer and at the first break in the proceedings they looked this one up. The senator, they found, had wrenched my words out of context. I looked at the text and saw that the passage he’d read out loud had been immediately followed by two other sentences: “But the libertarian argument overlooks the place of the Supreme Court in a scheme of separation of powers. One does not strengthen self-government and the rule of law by having the non-democratic branch of the government make policy.” The point I’d been making was the opposite of the one that Senator Biden claimed I had made.

pp 235-236 of "My Grandfather's Son" by Clarence Thomas


69 posted on 05/03/2009 7:31:59 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (IRONY - we know more about the First Dog's historical papers than we do of President Barack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch believes the president has used code words indicating he wants to appoint an activist to the Supreme Court, who will push a liberal agenda.

Hatch zeroed in on Obama's use of the word empathy in describing what he will look for in a new justice.

This is news?

70 posted on 05/03/2009 7:48:07 PM PDT by Lee N. Field (Come, behold the works of the LORD, how he has brought desolations on the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

You know you’re right.

Do you remember the conversations then?

He needs to bring 14 votes to our side!

That would be the essence of the bipartisanship of which he spoke.

His deeds of raw hypocrisy then are comparable to Neville Chamberlain’s ‘Peace in our time’ proclamation.


71 posted on 05/04/2009 8:37:48 AM PDT by Sundog (Forget the Tea Party. We need a Washington DC rocket club to hold a launch at the national mall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson