Perhaps I'm not qualified to pass judgment on him, but JimRob sure is.
Nothing I've said about the worthless liberal puke hasn't been said before here, many times!
Romney is not a socialist, I don’t care who says he is. Not as good on social issues, at least in the past, as I would like. But not a socialist.
And he is not deserving of crude ad hominem, I don’t care who utters it.
“but JimRob sure is.”
Why?
BTW you never answered this question.
“but JimRob sure is.”
“Why?”
No one is saying Jim isn’t a smart guy and that he has a right to establish the parameters and tone on his own website. The question was what makes Jim more qualified to establish the litmus test and definition for conservatism (outside his website) then say you or anyone else?