Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
-- Lopez says that mere possession of a firearm is not interstate commerce --

But that possession affects interstate commerce, and such a recitation must appear in the federal law that prohibits handguns w/in XX feet of a school. The Lopez decision was gutted months after its passage. It's holding is facile.

15 posted on 05/04/2009 7:32:56 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
“But that possession affects interstate commerce, and such a recitation must appear in the federal law that prohibits handguns w/in XX feet of a school. The Lopez decision was gutted months after its passage. It's holding is facile.”


I believe you are mistaken. Lopez was cited in United States v. Stewart, where the 9th circuit held that homemade machine-guns did not fall under jurisdiction of the Federal government because they were not involved in interstate commerce.

18 posted on 05/04/2009 7:44:53 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson