But she’s not trying to even deliberate this case, this isn’t jury nullification, it’s inappropriate bias toward the defendants.
so she is accused of bias. what jury is not biased????
if you believe the law is WRONG, you must not find guilty. It dont mater what teh laws says, it matters if it is right or not. that is the nice thing about the jury system. non-lawyers can decide if the law is good or not.
this is a right we have as jurors. most folks are not aware of this.
lets say the hate crime law is passed, and you get on a jury for a hate crime. if you dont belive in hate crimes (un-Constitutional) then you should find them not guilty, even if they did exactly what the prosecuter says they did.
if the law is bad, you have an obligation to stike it down in that case
the people must be involved to stop judical and prosecutor abuse of the Constitution.
when you are on the jury, you must uphold the Constitution first, not some laws passed by politicans or activist judges.
No judge has the right to remove a juror based on that jurors belief that the LAW IS WRONG. this judge should be kicked off the bench.