Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Does President Obama Hate the Polar Bears?
The Heritage Foundation/ The Foundry ^ | May 8th, 2009 | Conn Carroll

Posted on 05/09/2009 4:11:43 PM PDT by Delacon

Today the Obama administration’s Department of Interior announced that it would keep a Bush administration rule [1] forbidding government scientists from considering global warming when protecting polar bears pursuant to the Endangered Species Act.

When the Bush Interior Department announced their rule, they were roundly [2] criticized [3] by the enviro-left [4]. It will be interesting to see how they react to the Obama administration taking the same position.

More interesting is how the Obama EPA justified their decision. McClatchy reports [1]:

On Friday, the Interior Department reluctantly agreed, saying that it’s scientifically impossible to use the Endangered Species Act to regulate greenhouse gases, which are contributing to the warming of the earth and the resulting melting of bears’ habitat in Alaska. The emissions from a cement plant in Georgia, for example, can’t be tied directly to the precipitous decline in polar ice, Salazar said.

But neither can the emissions from just one car tailpipe be tied directly to global warming. So by that same logic, the EPA has no business regulating carbon emissions pursuant to the Clean Air Act. [5] If it is “scientifically impossible to use the Endangered Species Act to regulate greenhouse gases” than it is also scientifically impossible to use the CAA to regulate greenhouse gasses.

After all, The ESA is a far more powerful law than the CAA, especially if your aim is to shut down carbon emissions. Section 7 of the ESA requires all federal agencies [6] to consult with either the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) or the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS) for “any action authorized, funded, or carried out. [6]

In other words, every action funded by the federal government has the potential to be shut down by the ESA. All that billions of infrastructure funding in Obama’s $787 stimulus bill? It all would increase carbon emissions, so the ESA could kill it all.

No wonder Obama threw the polar bears under the bus.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: caa; climatechange; co2; epa; esa; globalwarming; polarbears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Past Your Eyes
There is no such thing as hypocrisy on the left.

The only way to be a hypocrite is to have some values in the first place.

If you have no values, you can never be a hypocrite.

21 posted on 05/10/2009 6:12:52 PM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tanuki

GMTA.


22 posted on 05/10/2009 6:35:32 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

What about black bears?


23 posted on 05/10/2009 11:11:19 PM PDT by Red Barr (The liberals cant get over our victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: metmom

LOL!


24 posted on 05/10/2009 11:30:21 PM PDT by tanuki (The only color of a leader that should matter is the color of his spine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson