Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Registration & Licensing 5th Amendment, Self-Incrimination, & Gun Registration
NRA - ILA ^ | 9/3/1999 | Clayton E. Cramer

Posted on 05/09/2009 4:27:54 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Don't ask me. I just copied the source code.
1 posted on 05/09/2009 4:27:54 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Rep. Vinson was a good man. You’d think this would be more obvious, but it isn’t completely obvious to conservatives.

Good post.

May I ask you a question? ;-]


2 posted on 05/09/2009 4:47:29 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
May I ask you a question? ;-]

It depends on the question you ask. You can ask. Maybe I'll answer.

3 posted on 05/09/2009 4:56:40 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

You just keep posting, OK?

(In this case OK is just a statement, not a real question, unless you don’t want to keep posting in which case that is OK, too.)


4 posted on 05/09/2009 5:02:42 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
It sounds paranoid to suggest that gun registration records might be used in the future to confiscate guns --

Would somebody, please, post the chronology of gun registration in NYC?

I don't remember the details, but it started with a minimal fee, and was supposed to help police track the source of recovered crime weapons.

The fees were later raised to provide revenue, and discourage gun ownership.

Eventually, when the politicians decided to ban certain guns (like "assault weapons") they reqired that the weapons be turned-in or removed from the city. They knew where the guns were, and went looking for them.

I'd like the chronology of this----when it started, when it progressed, how the fees increased, what guns were banned.

This is what is coming to the rest of the country.

Gun owners must understand that registration will lead to confiscation.

5 posted on 05/09/2009 5:09:50 PM PDT by cayuga (We lost the soapbox to MSM bias, and the ballot box to ACORN. The cartridge box is all we have left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Gun registration is not just wrong, but it should actually make us question the underlying assumptions about other forms of registration and licensing as well.

While this is not often done, it makes particular sense to those opposed to gun registration. If not at first, then perhaps after you think about it.

Why do citizens need to be licensed to drive a registered automobile?

Most people automatically assume “public safety”, but that may not actually be the case.

The State of Florida recently reached a quandary. Almost half a million Florida drivers drive without a valid driver’s license. So many, in fact, that the State police have given up worrying about it. They are far more concerned with stopping bad drivers than worrying about a piece of paper.

That is, there doesn’t seem to be any relationship between licenses and driving ability.

Most people then say, “But what about using a driver’s license as a form of ID?” Well, that’s not the purpose of a driver’s license, but it is how they are used, most of the time. But that is the purpose of a State ID card.

A State ID card, as well as a driver’s license, that can be used as a National ID card, has long be a dream of authoritarian government officials and lazy bureaucrats. And even many of the States have figured out that *that* is an awful idea, and want no part of it for their citizens.

Only when we start questioning assumptions like these, do we start to see the real fallacies behind gun registration and licensing. If gun registration serves no valid purpose, and it doesn’t, than to heck with it. And if gun licensing serves no valid purpose either, and it doesn’t, than to heck with it as well.

Because, the argument is the same for gun licensing as it is for driver’s licensing: “public safety”. And in either case, if unexamined, it seems reasonable enough on the surface.


6 posted on 05/09/2009 5:34:10 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cayuga

Gun owners must understand that registration will lead to confiscation.

Deserves repeating.


7 posted on 05/09/2009 5:35:55 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cayuga
This is what is coming to the rest of the country.

Not after Heller. The Ninth Circuit incorporated the Second Amendment in the Nordyke Decision as an individual right. This will be seen by the Supreme Court next session, IIRC. You don't pay for a right. These laws are going the way of the poll tax.

Life After Heller - More lawyers, more guns, some nunchuks, and the 14th Amendment

The chronolgy started in NYC in the 1960s. I never paid attention to this unConstitutional crap.

8 posted on 05/09/2009 5:53:30 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
It sounds paranoid to suggest that gun registration records might be used in the future to confiscate guns -- although the second director of Handgun Control, Inc. has stated explicitly that mandatory registration is one of the steps towards prohibition of handgun ownership

Once you start infringing on a right without due process you might as well kiss that right goodbye, because it no longer has anything like a firm foundation.

America -- a great idea, didn't last.

9 posted on 05/09/2009 6:29:21 PM PDT by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench
Gun owners must understand that registration will lead to confiscation.
Deserves repeating.

Been repeated, and ignored, so long the frog is now quite boiled.

10 posted on 05/09/2009 6:31:16 PM PDT by Clint Williams (Read Roto-Reuters -- we're the spinmeisters | America -- a great idea, didn't last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; nunya bidness; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ..
Ping from El Mexico Norte, er, L.A.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

11 posted on 05/09/2009 7:06:11 PM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench

It happened in the UK.

Will it happen here?

Will Obama sacrifice some ACORN employees to make it happen?

It’s either Bubba or ‘Bama.


12 posted on 05/09/2009 7:40:20 PM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cayuga

Not at all Paranoid to think that Registration precedes Confiscation.

In California. SKS registration then Confiscation.

WWII. In Norway. Registration by Norwegians then Confiscation by the Nazis.

Even in the Movie “RED DAWN” The order was given to go to all of the sporting goods stores and get the BATF Forms # 4473,
So they would know where to find the Guns.


13 posted on 05/09/2009 7:45:25 PM PDT by SwedeBoy2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The chronolgy started in NYC in the 1960s.

I know. I lived in western New York until 1977.

The progression in NYC was a classic example of the frog in the pot. I'm trying to pin down the timetable of the repression, sort of like a Time vs. Temperature plot for the frog.

I'll try the NRA for a timetable of NYC gun laws.

14 posted on 05/09/2009 8:06:31 PM PDT by cayuga (We lost the soapbox to MSM bias, and the ballot box to ACORN. The cartridge box is all we have left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cayuga

NY gun laws started in the 30’.


15 posted on 05/09/2009 8:57:02 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cayuga
Whoops! Sullivan Act dates to the early 1900’s. Forgot....
16 posted on 05/09/2009 9:00:24 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

I understand that the powers that controlled NYC politics wanted gun controls to keep weapons out of the hands of all those low class, no account foreigners who were immigrating to the US and then it just sort of got out of hand.


17 posted on 05/09/2009 9:17:22 PM PDT by Postman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Postman
Yep! The Sullivan Act alone is the epitome of the failure of ALL gun laws. Almost a hundred years old and it's only effect is more and more crime.
18 posted on 05/09/2009 9:54:59 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wrench
The 2nd Amendment says "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

I hold to the opinions that 1) too many of our gun rights has already been eroded and 2) registration has and will always be a Trojan horse leading to confiscation.

Too many crafty politicians and stupid citizens are too LAZY to read those famous last words SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!!

19 posted on 05/09/2009 10:53:50 PM PDT by prophetic (God, let 0Bama and his evil plans for this country fail & let him be utterly disgraced like HAMAN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD; wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; ...
You just keep posting, OK?

Thanks for the compliment.

In case, you missed my link to Clayton Cramer's article, I posted it here. Here's his blog.

Rep Peter King Plots Terrorist Act (Allegations Sufficient For Punishment)

Why Does President Obama Hate the Polar Bears? Good News!

FCC attack on talkers beginning? 'I hope you will not hesitate to propose aggressive solutions'

Climb - Conservatives must have the courage to defend their convictions.

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

20 posted on 05/09/2009 10:58:03 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson