Posted on 05/10/2009 2:09:03 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
KIGALI (AFP) Former Prime Minister Tony Blair on Sunday praised genocide-scarred Rwanda as "an inspiration to the world," after talks with President Paul Kagame.
"Rwanda has in a remarkably short period of time become a role model for Africa," said Blair, highlighting the small central African state's tourism industry just 15 years after a genocide that that left around 800,000 people massacred during a 100-day carnage.
"A country that was once a no-go area attracted more than a million visitors in 2008," Blair stated.
"It is one of the most stable countries in Africa," he added.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
Former Prime Minister Tony Blair, seen here on May 8, 2009, on Sunday praised genocide-scarred Rwanda as "an inspiration to the world," after talks with President Paul Kagame. (AFP/ANP/File/Ed Oudenaarden)
German tourist industry up after 15 Jew-free years < /satirical and cynical parallelism>.
Foremost proponent of “Genocide is gud for you”? Brits AND Americans better watch out. Recent recommendation of an 80% reduction of Brit population made by a utopian pseudointellectial in Britain...he thoughtfully includes the US in is recommendations. Obama has indicated in the recent past to Mr. Brown that Brit ideas would find favor in his administration and the UK would no longer have ‘poodle’ status.
Here is an excerpt:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5950442.ece
From The Sunday Times
March 22, 2009
UK population must fall to 30m, says Porritt
Jonathan Leake and Brendan Montague
JONATHON PORRITT, one of Gordon Browns leading green advisers, is to warn that Britain must
drastically reduce its population if it is to build a sustainable society.
Porritts call will come at this weeks annual conference of the Optimum Population Trust (OPT),
of which he is patron.
The trust will release research suggesting UK population must be cut to 30m if the country
wants to feed itself sustainably.
Porritt said: Population growth, plus economic growth, is putting the world under terrible
pressure.
Each person in Britain has far more impact on the environment than those in developing
countries so cutting our population is one way to reduce that impact.
Population growth is one of the most politically sensitive environmental problems. The issues it
raises, including religion, culture and immigration policy, have proved too toxic for most green
groups.
However, Porritt is winning scientific backing. Professor Chris Rapley, director of the Science
Museum, will use the OPT conference, to be held at the Royal Statistical Society, to warn that
population growth could help derail attempts to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
Rapley, who formerly ran the British Antarctic Survey, said humanity was emitting the equivalent
of 50 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere each year.
We have to cut this by 80%, and population growth is going to make that much harder, he said.
Such views on population have split the green movement. George Monbiot, a prominent writer
on green issues, has criticised population campaigners, arguing that relentless economic
growth is a greater threat.
Many experts believe that, since Europeans and Americans have such a lopsided impact on the
environment, the world would benefit more from reducing their populations than by making cuts
in developing countries.
This is part of the thinking behind the OPTs call for Britain to cut population to 30m roughly
what it was in late Victorian times.
Britains population is expected to grow from 61m now to 71m by 2031. Some politicians
support a reduction.
Phil Woolas, the immigration minister, said: You cant have sustainability with an increase in
population.
The Tory leader, David Cameron, has also suggested Britain needs a coherent strategy on
population growth.
Despite these comments, however, government and Conservative spokesmen this weekend both
distanced themselves from any population policy.
Which is exactly why I have no desire to ever go to Africa.
I very much doubt that Western and Asian tourists care at all about the Hutu-Tutsi feud, or can even tell you the history of the tribes.
One big difference. The Germans went along with the Nazis. Their genocide was stopped by outside conquest. The genocide in Rwanda was stopped by the Rwandan victims themselves. The Tutsi rebel army aided by the Hutu moderates did the job.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.