I could have beaten you in a debate even when I was 12 years old. You are a waste of bandwidth (and oxygen). bye.
Prove your assertion or run away yet again. You have consistently made blunder after blunder. You've been caught trying to change the subject and using misdirection and here you are using a pitiful ad hominem attack.
You are a waste of bandwidth (and oxygen). bye.
This is the third time you've put your tail between your legs and run away.
Perhaps you should return when you can convince lesbian activist Camille Paglia that your position has any merit. Here is what she said, from post 164:
"Homosexuality is not 'normal.' On the contrary it is a challenge to the norm...Nature exists whether academics like it or not. And in nature, procreation is the single relentless rule. That is the norm. Our sexual bodies were designed for reproduction...No one is born gay. The idea is ridiculous...homosexuality is an adaptation, not an inborn trait.....The good news is you can start over with me anytime you want, but you have to stop playing games. That means stop trying to change the subject, stop using misdirection and stop the personal attacks."Is the gay identity so fragile that it cannot bear the thought that some people may not wish to be gay? Sexuality is highly fluid, and reversals are theoretically possible. However, habit is refractory, once the sensory pathways have been blazed and deepened by repetition-a phenomenon obvious in the struggle with obesity, smoking, alcoholism or drug addiction....helping gays to learn to function heterosexually, if they wish, is a perfectly worthy aim.
"We should be honest enough to consider whether homosexuality may not indeed be a pause a the prepubescent stage where children anxiously band together by gender....current gay cant insists that homosexuality is 'not a choice,' that no one would choose to be gay in a homophobic society. But there is an element of choice in all behavior, sexual or otherwise. It takes an effort to deal with the opposite sex; it is safer with your own kind. The issue is one of challenge versus comfort."