Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report citing veteran extremism is pulled
WashTimes ^ | Thursday, May 14, 2009 | Audrey Hudson

Posted on 05/14/2009 4:46:27 AM PDT by radar101

A contentious "Rightwing Extremism" report that warned of military veterans as possible recruits for terrorist attacks against the U.S. was not authorized, has been withdrawn and is being rewritten, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told Capitol Hill lawmakers.

"The wheels came off the wagon because the vetting process was not followed," Ms. Napolitano told the House Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday.

"The report is no longer out there," she said. "An employee sent it out without authorization."

The report was shared with state and local law enforcement officials nationwide via the department's internal Web site on April 7, angering Republican lawmakers and military veterans who said it unfairly stereotyped veterans.

Ms. Napolitano did not say when the report was taken off the "intel Web site" and all Homeland Security Department Web sites, but she said it is in the process of being "replaced or redone in a much more useful and much more precise fashion."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dhs; fusioncenter; fusioncenters; napolitano; ritewingextremists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 05/14/2009 4:46:27 AM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radar101

I bet the new one is classified SECRET to keep it out of the hands of the likes of us.

Think some Washington Times reporter will spill it and defy Eric Holder?


2 posted on 05/14/2009 4:47:59 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Napolitano needs to withdraw FireNapolitano.com
3 posted on 05/14/2009 4:49:01 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
"The wheels came off the wagon because the vetting process was not followed," Ms. Napolitano told the House Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday.

Yeah, how's your vetting process going, Prez?

4 posted on 05/14/2009 4:51:13 AM PDT by bgill (The evidence simply does not support the official position of the Obama administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

That lesbo needs to be fired. Then she can go on MSNBC and work with Madcow.


5 posted on 05/14/2009 4:52:50 AM PDT by shankbear (Al-Qaeda grew while Monica blew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Ah, oops, got caught(d*** the internet). Happy face time folks—we’re withdrawing the report. Someone (we’ll figure out who to throw under the bus later) didn’t follow the “vetting” process.

The irony here, of course, is that no Vet in his/her right mind would ever attack America. However, many of us will have no compunction about fighting anyone who means America harm—including internal Marxist enemies.

This report demonstrates that The Marxist Onada’s crowd views Vets as threats to their usurped presidency. The arrogant fools equate themselves with America.


6 posted on 05/14/2009 4:54:56 AM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Ms. Napolitano said the report titled "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment," is not the only report she has seen that says veterans are targets for recruitment by racist and other hate groups.

O.K., exactly how many other similar reports are there, floating around DHS?

7 posted on 05/14/2009 4:55:27 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
A contentious "Rightwing Extremism" report that warned of military veterans as possible recruits for terrorist attacks against the U.S. was not authorized

...to be released.

8 posted on 05/14/2009 4:55:39 AM PDT by SIDENET (Hubba Hubba...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

These people are so full of shite! This is just like saying “the jury will pay no attention to this criminal’s murderous behavior”. And it took them over a MONTH to retract it? Sorry Janet ... your mission was accomplished and you know damn well it was!


9 posted on 05/14/2009 4:55:40 AM PDT by Babalu ("Tracer rounds work both ways ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

As BO says: “The horse is all ready out of the barn.”
Too late now Mr. Napalitano.

I love how these incapable numb-skulls try to cover their @$$’$ after the fact.

BTW, there is no vetting process, anywhere in that administration.


10 posted on 05/14/2009 4:55:43 AM PDT by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shankbear

“That lesbo needs to be fired. Then she can go on MSNBC and work with Madcow.”

She might have a better gig lined up. SCOTUS!

Doesn’t this make you feel all warm and fuzzy!?!?!!?!


11 posted on 05/14/2009 4:57:09 AM PDT by mark3681
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

It took ‘em over a month to pull the report. And it’s done under the lame guise of, “Oops! Someone ELSE is to blame.”

Too late.
Nobody’s buying it.


12 posted on 05/14/2009 4:57:39 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Satisfaction was my sin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

The sad part is that a whole lot of people bought it, and will continue to buy it!


13 posted on 05/14/2009 4:58:45 AM PDT by Babalu ("Tracer rounds work both ways ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: radar101

“An employee sent it out without authorization.”

Liar! That is utter Nancy Pelosi!


14 posted on 05/14/2009 4:59:13 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101
The rewrite is quite simple:

Nevermind.

15 posted on 05/14/2009 5:00:55 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Ah yes ... the infamous “employee”. That person has been doing some pretty stupid things for as long as I’ve lived, and he/she/it is still around?


16 posted on 05/14/2009 5:01:11 AM PDT by Babalu ("Tracer rounds work both ways ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: radar101

If DHS were really serious about extremists in the US they would start by cleaning out the Jihadist camps already set up in the USA.

Video link at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2bPVRjM-fA&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffrontpagemagazine%2Ecom%2F&feature=player_


17 posted on 05/14/2009 5:03:10 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

Somebody else to blame!

Usual course of action, this Administration gets caught (in this case with a report stating what it really thinks of those who are not in step with the dictates of the Politburo), and looks for some underling who would happen to be convenient to throw under the bus. Not Napolitano, she is obviously a member of the Politburo, otherwise she would have been carted off in the Black Maria.


18 posted on 05/14/2009 5:04:28 AM PDT by Fred Hayek (Minnesota - You all can go to hell. I'm going to Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: radar101
Statement by U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano on the Threat of Right-Wing Extremism

http://www.dhs.gov/ynews/releases/pr_1239817562001.shtm

Release Date: April 15, 2009

For Immediate Release Office of the Press Secretary Contact: 202-282-8010

The primary mission of this department is to prevent terrorist attacks on our nation. The document on right-wing extremism sent last week by this department’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis is one in an ongoing series of assessments to provide situational awareness to state, local and tribal law enforcement agencies on the phenomenon and trends of violent radicalization in the United States. I was briefed on the general topic, which is one that struck a nerve as someone personally involved in the Timothy McVeigh prosecution.

Let me be very clear: we monitor the risks of violent extremism taking root here in the United States. We don’t have the luxury of focusing our efforts on one group; we must protect the country from terrorism whether foreign or homegrown, and regardless of the ideology that motivates its violence.

We are on the lookout for criminal and terrorist activity but we do not – nor will we ever – monitor ideology or political beliefs. We take seriously our responsibility to protect the civil rights and liberties of the American people, including subjecting our activities to rigorous oversight from numerous internal and external sources.

I am aware of the letter from American Legion National Commander Rehbein, and my staff has already contacted him to set up a meeting next week once I return from travel. I will tell him face-to-face that we honor veterans at DHS and employ thousands across the department, up to and including the Deputy Secretary.

As the department responsible for protecting the homeland, DHS will continue to work with its state and local partners to prevent and protect against the potential threat to the United States associated with any rise in violent extremist activity.

19 posted on 05/14/2009 5:04:51 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

These reports are being written because Homelad Security knows that the Constitution for the united States is now being trashed by every branch of the Federal Government, and they deeply fear that millions of Americans still insist on adherence to the Constitution.

The report was withdrawn. Aaaha! But not before it was already sent to poison the minds of a younger generation of law-enforcement officers.

Homeland Security, so-called, is setting a stage for a nation without any Constitutional guarantees of anything. They are trying to prevent another stage from being set, and that is one in defense of the Constitution.

Those who act to defend the constitution in good faith and conscience, measured by the level and circumstances of the increasing attacks upon it, can never be properly labeled terrorists, but rather PATRIOTS.


20 posted on 05/14/2009 5:07:54 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson