Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brookhaven

“As someone with Cherokee ancestors, I find this very offensive.

Other indian based team names (Chiefs, Braves, Warriors) even ones names after tribes (FSU Seminoles) are not offensive at all, imho. They highlight a positive aspect of indian historical culture. Redskin though, is a slur. Plain and simple.”

Why is ‘red skin’ a slur? My Cherokee ancestors were never ashamed of the color of their skin.


10 posted on 05/15/2009 10:18:16 AM PDT by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: AuntB

I always though “redskin” was right up there with “injun” definitely in the slur area. Of course there is no right not to be offended, people who don’t like the team’s name should root against them (really easy to do these days because they stink), boycott them, boycott the whole league if they want, but don’t make it a legal matter.


21 posted on 05/15/2009 10:27:24 AM PDT by razorboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: AuntB; Brookhaven

I’m 1/4 Cherokee and I’m not offended, either!

I think thin skinned is more appropriate for some... >:-}


24 posted on 05/15/2009 10:31:02 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: AuntB

I’m with you Aunt B


29 posted on 05/15/2009 10:37:13 AM PDT by gidget7 (Duncan Hunter-Valley Forge Republican!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson