Posted on 05/19/2009 8:30:26 AM PDT by shortstop
Future historians might well look back on events of the last week and see a milestone of decline in the waning saga of American freedom.
The bridge between the free market and a command economy was likely crossed when, at government demand, thousands of car dealerships all across the country were put out of business. They were profitable, they were legal, they were useful, and the White House ordered them closed. A presidential panel, comprised of everyone except car-industry experts, demanded that Chrysler and GM cut off a third of their dealers’ heads.
Hundreds of thousands will lose their jobs. Thousands of businesses will close. Millions of consumers will be affected.
Because the government said so.
If Chrysler and GM want their mandatory bailout money, they must do what the White House says, and the White House says there are too many car dealers. And so, people’s lives will be destroyed, massive investments will be lost, family businesses will be annihilated, the life’s work of countless honest American business men and women will be flushed down the toilet.
And barely a whimper of protest is being heard. The crown has spoken and the subjects bow and scrape.
The argument is that, in the shadow of bankruptcy, GM and Chrysler need to shed the deadweight of underperforming dealerships. The problem with that is that dealerships are not a financial liability for carmakers and that many of the dealerships that have gotten the ax are among the nation’s most profitable.
One Jeep dealer in upstate New York, for example, sells just over half of all the Jeeps in its region. It not only outsells all of the other Jeep dealerships, it outsells all of the other Jeep dealerships combined.
And it has lost its franchise.
Another false assumption is that dealerships cost carmakers money. They do not. They make carmakers money. Even small, low-volume dealerships are a net financial gain for manufacturers. Dealers not only make companies money by selling their automobiles, they have to pay for signs and pamphlets and displays, all of which can only be bought – at exorbitant prices – from the manufacturers.
Further, it is insane for any business to assume that it makes more money by reducing retail outlets for its products. What did Wal-Mart do to make more money? It built more stores. What did McDonald’s do to make more money? It built more stores. What did Starbucks to do make more money? It built more stores. What are GM and Chrysler doing to make more money? The exact opposite.
That might make sense in the anti-car fantasies of the ruling regime in Washington, but it makes no sense whatsoever on the balance sheet. It is pure big-government-knows-everything lunacy.
It is also a disservice to consumers.
The Obama dealership closings gut many rural areas, taking away both sales and service. Buying a car, or getting your car fixed, will now require a trip to some far-off city.
Some argue that with declining sales at GM and Chrysler, it is only natural that there should be fewer dealerships. That is true. Of late, some 400 or 500 American dealerships have gone out of business each year. But that has been a function of the marketplace, not of government dictate. Those who can’t keep their heads above water have sold out or shut down.
Those who’ve kept in the black, who have been able to remain profitable, have stayed in business – until now. But now, profitable businesses, which seemed poised to continue to employ people and stay in operation for years to come, are on the way out.
In addition to the impact on owners and employees, the communities they serve are also devastated. In many areas, in states where sales tax is a major part of a community’s revenues, the car dealership was the largest single source of local taxes. That loss is huge for municipal budgets. The same is true for the various charities, United Ways, sports teams and school activities that have long relied on the generosity of car dealers.
In one fell swoop, because the White House said so, that is all gone.
Ironically, the government has decided to decimate the only profitable part of the car industry. Not only are the car dealers not operating at a loss, they are the only part of the car industry that isn’t being bailed out. So the government is propping up the part of the car business that doesn’t work, and attacking the part that does.
It is morally and legally wrong. This is not the way a free country operates. It is absolutely not the American way. This is the first taste of a command economy, of central-government planning of industry and commerce.
It didn’t work in the Soviet Union, it didn’t work in Cuba, it didn’t work in North Korea, and it won’t work in the United States. If their goal is to take private transportation away from Americans – and it might be – this is a good idea.
Otherwise it’s a horrible idea.
It is an attack on the free market, on the value of investment, on the ownership of property. It is essentially an act of theft.
This is change we can believe in, and will come to regret.
I don’t get how these dealers would have remained open even outside of government action. Ford shut down many dealers and it is still a private company. I would imagine that other dealers will shut down simply because they are not selling anything.
And the corrupt unions live on.....
Socialists despise America’s car culture. It’s internationally known.
It’s part of that “independent spirit”. Cars with style. Go where you want to go.
They are pushing “smart growth” densely packed urban hell on us and discouraging commuting, travel, parking, and comfort. Get in a people mover or “bicycle” where you “should” be going.
Now we’ll have 2-cylinder ecomobiles that will become road pizza when an 18-wheeler meets you at a traffic light.
Then again, Obama rode in SUVs during his campaign appearances. All animals are equal. Some are more equal than others.
Falicy one. We are not the cause of global climate change.
Falicy two. Oil is evil. There are evil nations in this world, but the oil is not evil.
Falicy three. It isn’t any better to pay $4 a gallon for gas just because we are getting twice the gas millage.
This is about control and Obama just threw thousands of people under the bus (thousands of car dealerships, thousands of employees at dealerships).
Makes you wonder which politicians made the list of dealerships to go, and which ones would stay. Hey, Chris Dodd, your son owns that dealership in Hartford? Okay, we'll get rid of the closest 10 dealerships. That'll make his super profitable, but I'll need to be convinc$d that I'm doing the right thing, if you know what I m$an.
One big misstatement. Buying a car and obtaining service will NOT require a trip to a distant city. Only the insane will believe that the CUSTOMER will put up with this kind of stupid inconvenience. A tiny few may be so wedded to a particular brand that they will drive over hill and dale to buy their beloved Obamabile, but the sane among us will buy where it is convenient.
The fact that PROFITABLE dealerships are being arbitrarily shut down makes me ask ANOTHER question.
Is there maybe, possibly, could be, ya think, a correlation between shut down and the VOTING patterns of the area? Maybe like a payoff to those who vote right.
When the PROFITABLE is cut off and shut down, while the failure is “permitted” to continue, I get that funny feeling. To quote the bard...”something is rotten in the USA”
It’s called tyranny. Dictatorship.
Not to be conspiracy-minded, but might there be a connection between all these dealerships going and the advent of the warranty expiration calls and the extended warranty baloney (U.S. Fidelis, Mogi, etc.)? Just wondering.
FYI, in light of the other dealership issue thread yesterday...
I would like to see a red congressional district/blue congressional district analysis of these closures. There’s a lot of hardship with these closures and I would think that representatives would have made noises...
They purchased all their dealership's debt.
The dealers survived.
I don't think the government is making a mistake ~ dealers are a dime a dozen ~ always somebody out there wants to be done.
As Lonsberry points out, these dealers go out of business on their own if they are truly a financial drain on the car manufacturers. Meanwhile, the UAW flunkies in "Jobs Banks" continue to suck the company resources dry while they sit around reading newspapers and drinking coffee.
My local New Holland tractor dealership I deal with lost it's franchise Jan 1 2009. Darn Obama shut it down.
Oh wait nevermind. (it was actually due to not meeting minimum production requirements)
Too bad the average Joe doesn’t grasp who is making the decision to close dealerships. They will blame car execs when the shots are really being called by Geitner and Obama, neither of whom has so much as run a hot dog stand let alone a major industry.
On Beck last Friday, a Chrystler dealership that had been in business for almost 60 years and was profitible was being forcibly closed, while a new dealership was opening up two miles down the road. I want to know who is paying for these 'favors'.
Most dealers that were shut down were small (aka rural, aka red area, aka mom and pop shops, aka paying less in tax/tribute to the govt.)
Oh gee, I wonder why that happened.
“Now we’ll have 2-cylinder ecomobiles “
Actually, we have huge subsidies for hybrids which get great gas mileage in stop and go traffic/also know as city/urban traffic and don’t do that well on open roads where conservatives live.
I wonder how that happened ?
Did anyone check the party affiliations of the dealers who kept their businesses?
I guess we all know by now we have a dictatorship in Washington. Only a few newspapers aren’t in bed with the Muslim Fuehrer; Washington Times, NYPost, Imprimus, Canada Fee Press.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.