Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Thank-you....I appreciate your wisdom.


51 posted on 05/26/2009 6:46:29 AM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Guenevere; P-Marlowe

The good news is that this doesn’t change the balance of the court.

It is, however, an appointment that should have belonged to the conservative coalition that saw to the 2 elections of Reagan, one of Bush Sr, and 2 of Bush Jr.

That coalition worked for decades to reach a majority court, and right when it was in grasp, the rinos blew the election. Souter, a republican nomination, should have retired so that Bush could have appointed his replacement. Because he is a liberal, he did not. That betrayal is small, though, compared to the greater betrayal....the intentional loss of the last election.

Shame on the fair weather conservative and independent Christians who bought the media line and put a baby killer in office who has now appointed a baby killer to the court.

There will be hell to pay.


54 posted on 05/26/2009 7:28:36 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain, Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson