Posted on 05/26/2009 8:08:06 AM PDT by kellynla
TO: JCN Members and Interested Parties FROM: Wendy Long, Counsel to Judicial Confirmation Network RE: Obama Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor
President Obama has threatened to nominate liberal judicial activists who will indulge their left-wing policy preferences instead of neutrally applying the law. In selecting Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his Supreme Court nominee, President Obama has carried out his threat.
Judge Sotomayor will allow her feelings and personal politics to stand in the way of basic fairness. In a recent case, Ricci v. DeStefano, Sotomayor sided with a city that used racially discriminatory practices to deny promotions to firefighters. The percuriam opinion Sotomayor joined went so far out of its way to bury the firefighters' important claims of unfair treatment that her colleague, Judge Jose Cabranes, a Clinton appointee, chastised her.
According to Judge Cabranes, Sotomayor's opinion "contains no reference whatsoever to the constitutional claims at he core of this case" and its "perfunctory disposition rests uneasily with the weighty issues presented by this appeal." Even the liberal Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen expressed disappointment with the case, stating, "Ricci is not just a legal case but a man who has been deprived of the pursuit of happiness on account of race."
Sotomayor's terrible decision in Ricci is under review by the Supreme Court and an opinion is expected by the end of June.
Sotomayor readily admits that she applies her feelings and personal politics when deciding cases. In a 2002 speech at Berkeley, she stated that she believes it is appropriate for a judge to consider their "experiences as women and people of color," which she believes should "affect our decisions." She went on to say in that same speech "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life." She reiterated her commitment to that lawless judicial philosophy at Duke Law School in 2005 when she stated that the "Court of Appeals is where policy is made."
The poor quality of Sotomayor's decisions is reflected in her terrible record of reversals by the Supreme Court.
Sotomayor is a favorite of far left special interest groups. In addition to her record as a hard left judicial activist, Sotomayor has been recommended for the Supreme Court by Nan Aron of the very liberal Alliance for Justice, who stated in a 2004 memo to the Senate Judiciary Committee that Sotomayor had "been through an initial vetting and fit into the criteria that we believe should be the standard for any Supreme Court justice."
The White House is sure to argue that Sotomayor is a "bipartisan pick" because Bush 41 appointed her to the district court: President George H.W. Bush nominated Sotomayor in 1991 only because the New York senators had forced on the White House a deal that enabled Senator Moynihan to name one of every four district court nominees in New York. In 1998, 29 Republican senators voted against President Clinton's nomination of Sotomayor to the Second Circuit.
And this video is all the GOP will need.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ug-qUvI6WFo
Oh man, Levin will have a barn burner of a radio show tonight.
“And this video is all the GOP will need.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ug-qUvI6WFo";
I believe Obama just nominated his “Zoe Baird”.
All you white working stiffs..if you voted for Zero..then this is what you deserve.
Youtube: “The URL contained a malformed video ID.”
We can only hope our few remaining Republican senators have the nerve and stamina to try to block the nominee.
As the Dems have a super majority, she probably will get in. Our only consolation will be she has a personality that is not likely to work as consensus building on the court, she is not that bright and misses issues and (I will be slammed for this) has diabetes and may not have too many years on the court.
If I'm wrong .. the zero administration is daring someone to fire the second shot heard 'round the world.
yep...is he back?
Quien es?
Sounds like this woman makes up the law on a liberal whim. Levin is going to go ape tonight.
Sotomayor readily admits that she applies her feelings and personal politics when deciding cases. In a 2002 speech at Berkeley, she stated that she believes it is appropriate for a judge to consider their “experiences as women and people of color,” which she believes should “affect our decisions.”
I thought it was supposed to be all men are created equal.
well, if we’re lucky, maybe she didn’t pay her taxes...
but, Hussein is playing right into conservatives’ hands....
The GOP will be able to beat this nomination, along with all his other Liberalisms, over Hussein’s head for the next three years...he’s gonna be the best thing to happen to the GOP since Jimmy Carter
bump
I dont think the super majority matters until she gets out of the Judiciary Committee. IIRC she needs at least one GOP vote to do that.
IOW, if all GOP members of the Judiciary Committee vote no, I believe she would be a footnote in judicial history. The problem is making that happen.
I think I have this right but I am not certain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.