Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maelstorm

I don’t understand how anyone could believe that there is not a genetic component.

It exists in other species. Mother nature does not make “mistakes” this often, sorry.

I don’t claim to know the “reason” why, by the way.

Besides, a guy like me would have to have a genetic component to be attracted to another male.

There is nothing within my control, NOTHING, that would change my preference. I simply could not be sexually attracted to a male.

This is merely introspection I know. But I just can’t see it happening any other way.

This is leaving aside the molestation/rape factor which does influence things.

At the end of the day, I don’t care who loves who and what they do consentually.

I don’t want the definition of marriage changed, however. Equal rights, fine, but the term “marriage” should not include same sex couples.


10 posted on 05/26/2009 11:08:24 PM PDT by Boucheau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Boucheau

And why must something be genetic in order to be justified? Must someone be a genetic slave in order for something to be acceptable now?

Can’t someone do it because he likes it, as other people like golf?


11 posted on 05/27/2009 6:18:48 AM PDT by THV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson