Here is a link to the proposed curriculum: http://www.eqforall.com/proposed-lgbt-curriculum.html
As I posted last week, in this curriculm, a married man and woman, and their biological children are not included in the definition of a family.
From the proposed curriculum’s Vocabulary Words: (http://www.alameda.k12.ca.us/LGBT/Vocabulary%20Words.pdf)
"Family: a group of people living together and functioning as a single household.
Blended Family: When two separate families join together to live as one single family unit.
Divorced Family: When the parents in a family are no longer married. The children live with one or the other of the parents in an agreed upon decision.
Mixed Family: When two or more cultures and ethnicities join together to form one family.
Single Parent Family: When only one parent raises the children in a family"
I do not understand how such a one-sided curriculum can be enacted. But as the article above states, it has been enacted. The justification for the curriculum was to curb anti-gay bullying. How much anti-gay bullying really exists in kindergarten through fifth grade? If it does exist, isn't it the responsibility of the school principals and teachers to correct the problem as a discipline issue?
If there are any freepers in Alameda, I'd like to hear how this issue is perceived in your area.
This is discriminatory. The school should halt ALL bullying.
Now there will be even less time for the basics.
This thread is gay.
(You won’t be able to say that in school anymore)
I'd wager that overwhelming majority of non-immigrant families in America are "mixed".
talk about a misleading headline.
They are going to start gay sex ed in Kindergarten, they already have a book about gay penguins raising a baby penguin
If Homosexuality was truly about the actions of “consenting adults in private” and nothing but, the kindergarteners wouldn’t even know anything about it.
Why don’t parents demand schools focus on academics, do they have any idea how much money goes to the “pet-projects”.
We need anti gay bullying laws.
It’s about time they did something about Perez Hilton.
If the scout master, priest, or stranger is in the eyes of a child, gay because of their willingness to participate in aberrant behavior shouldn't the children object? Shouldn't they declare it non-normal? Shouldn't they react to it in the same way the left deals with discrimination? With their non-acceptance?
This is the excuse liberals use to teach kids about homosexual sex and force them to find it lovely and natural for their own lives.
First they have to explain what a homosexual is so they kids will know who not to bully...or who to submit to!
This policy is gay.
When is the next school board election. I sent each of the board members a letter which is about all I could do but those in that district should focus on eliminating those who voted for this. Find candidates remove them from positions of power, that is how Democracy works.
What a bunch of fags.
The question is, what do they consider “bullying,” and will this program be used to present deviant sexual behavior to little children in order to desensitize them to its deviance, and get them to accept it as “normal”?
My suspicion is that the answer to the second part of the question will be “Yes.” My suspicion is that it will also be labeled “bullying” if any child dares to say that homosexual behavior is sick and wrong.
“School district leaders have approved lesson plans for kindergartners through fifth graders “
If there are gay kindergartners, do they have the legal right to marry?
The queers are not just demanding that their deathstyle be tolerated by society, they ar pushing for society to annoint them as sacred cows.
They have gone too far, major backlash is coming.
None. This is a trojan horse to get gay indoctrination and recruitment into elementary schools across the nation. Gay marriage movement was the first step. What they really want is to get to your children under the guise of "bullying".
“Gay” pretend parents.