Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PetroniusMaximus

All you hear about from mainstream sources is how brutal the Shah’s regime was. I am sure there were a lot of autocratic aspects of the regime, and that political opponents were jailed-—but look what the guy was up against. Now compare Iran under the mullahs to when it was under the Shah-—a paradise compared to today.I remember speaking to one fellow who was a young teen living in Iran because his father worked for an American company. He said it was free like the US, but it wasn’t so repessive. When I spoke to him the Shah was still in power.


29 posted on 05/29/2009 10:40:29 AM PDT by brooklyn dave (First Atlas Shrugged, now he's screaming his a$$ off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: brooklyn dave

It was (and is) naive to expect a developing country in the islamic world to be perfect on matters like press freedom or political participation. But Iran was without a doubt ahead for it’s time and place, and most importantly it was allied with the West and attempting to become a Western country. What more to expect? Especially as you said the Shah was facing a constant threat of Communist and Islamist Extremism.

When I lived in Iran during the latter years of the Shah, he argueably was most autocratic (1974-78), and it was a wonderful place to live in with freedoms you can’t imagine in Iran today.

The Shah was a true Renaissance man...
but the leftists in the West preferred to support instead a savage barbarian mullah lunatic.


30 posted on 05/29/2009 2:44:28 PM PDT by SolidWood (Palin: "We do not want to become slaves of Washington.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson