> Where as the theory of creationism depends on ?
Who said anything about creationism?
We were talking about evolutionism.
In any event, they are both theories employed to explain the same evidence based on different world views.
However, given the endless frauds in evolutionism, e.g. Haekel, Nebraska Man, Piltdown Man, Java Man, Ntional Geographic’s “Dino Bird”, etc, and the fact that no explanation exists for organs that would be “vestigial” until wholly functioning, e.g. the eye, I would say that Intelligent Design is the more intelligent explanation.
However, if you want to believe...
* Everything came from nowhere out of nothing for no apparent reason.
* Life is just a curious side effect of an unknowing, uncaring cosmos.
* A man is a dog is a bear is a pig.
* When you die you are just so much compost.
* Ergo, the best you can hope for is a life of self-gratification and a painless extinction.
... I certainly won’t try to stop you.
Just don’t expect me to gladly furnish moneys by the threat of lethal force to propagate your silly, even dangerous, notions.