To: abb
Newspapers kills trees. Tress absorb CO2. This makes newspapers a serous threat to life on the planet. Why should we save something we know for a fact from reading them causes the greatest threat to our existence.
4 posted on
05/30/2009 2:12:20 AM PDT by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
To: Always Right
because the message is more important.
Remember it is a religion.
8 posted on
05/30/2009 2:25:10 AM PDT by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
To: Always Right
Newspapers kills trees. Tress absorb CO2. This makes newspapers a serous threat to life on the planet. Why should we save something we know for a fact from reading them causes the greatest threat to our existence.I know you are being sarcastic but the whole article was about on-line newspapers...
19 posted on
05/30/2009 4:03:03 AM PDT by
raybbr
(It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson