Sotomayor covers up her intellectual inadequacy by bullying from the bench.
What else would you expect from Obama?
To: advance_copy
To: advance_copy
Heck, I could probably crush her in a debate.
3 posted on
05/30/2009 10:23:42 AM PDT by
wastedyears
(Rock and roll ain't worth the name if it don't make ya strut)
To: advance_copy
Harriet Miers was a better nominee.
4 posted on
05/30/2009 10:26:36 AM PDT by
syriacus
(Justice is blind, so Justice Sonia Sotomayor will use her Spidey-sense to decide how to rule.)
To: advance_copy
Being a lightweight is the least of her problems. Being an anti-constitutionalist is enough.
5 posted on
05/30/2009 10:28:12 AM PDT by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: advance_copy
To: advance_copy
Obummer had the Odacity to say she’s the most qualified nominee in a century. Dude’s on crack.
7 posted on
05/30/2009 10:31:59 AM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: advance_copy
Do we want a smart Communist, or do we want a stupid Communist? Seems to me, we want a stupid Communist. Which is why Sotomayer should be confirmed....
To: advance_copy
I wonder how in depth of questions she’ll get in her hearings. Personal questions? She’s single since 1983. Does she have a boyfriend? Girlfriend? Is she celebate? They weren’t shy about Clarence Thomas.
10 posted on
05/30/2009 10:34:00 AM PDT by
umgud
(Look to gov't to solve your everday problems and they'll control your everday life.)
To: advance_copy
What should Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee do?...Lay out the lady's record. And let America get a close look at the kind of justice Barack Obama believes in. No no no! The Moderate Republicans are telling us to be quiet and not expose obama's radicalism.
11 posted on
05/30/2009 10:42:10 AM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Notre Dame's motto: "Kill our unborn children? YES WE CAN!")
To: advance_copy
She would fit perfectly as a host on “The View”!
12 posted on
05/30/2009 10:42:39 AM PDT by
Kandy
To: advance_copy
She certainly doesn’t appear to have the intellectual firepower that other previous SCOTUS nominees had. Maybe that’s a good thing.
13 posted on
05/30/2009 10:43:18 AM PDT by
506Lake
To: advance_copy
The Pubs should ask the same questions that were asked of conservative judge nominees by Dems in the past. Then when the Dems/press object tell them they are the very questions they asked themselves of Bork, Thomas, Gonzales, etc.
Won't matter but might open some eyes.
17 posted on
05/30/2009 11:29:51 AM PDT by
TangoLimaSierra
(To the left the truth looks Right-Wing.)
To: advance_copy
She none to smart, she iz.
What a tragedy. At least she’s replacing one of the worse, so the net loss is minimal.
18 posted on
05/30/2009 11:31:01 AM PDT by
BlueStateBlues
(Blue State business, Red State heart. . . . .Palin 2012----can't come soon enough!)
To: advance_copy
She looks more like a “run stopper” to me.
To: advance_copy
She wasn’t chosen for her intellect. She was nominated for her thoroughly dependable, leftist decisions.
22 posted on
05/30/2009 12:06:28 PM PDT by
Oldpuppymax
(AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
To: advance_copy
She’s nothing but a front and toadie.
23 posted on
05/30/2009 12:19:00 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: advance_copy
She is an Hate America Idiot nothing more ,why else would the moron Zero pick her.
24 posted on
05/30/2009 12:31:21 PM PDT by
Cheetahcat
(Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
To: advance_copy
She needs a huge tax problem or a legion of undocumented household help. Otherwise, bigotry and incompetence will take her to the pinnacle of judiciary power in 0bama Nation.
Throw in gay or socialistic, and she’ll get even more confirmation votes.
To: advance_copy
Pat’s right but it is so un-PC to write or say it that the GOP is cowed by it already. Only Talk Radio and Fox have any guts to go after her on her positions which would , if she were a Pub, would get her not advised or consented!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson