I certainly do have a “concept” of the scale of the problem —I have been a prolife ACTIVIST for forty years.
If just ONE baby’s life is saved by Tiller’s death, that is a good thing.
As the Jewish proverb goes “He who has saved one life has saved the whole world.”
Was this someone who was very proficient with guns?
Maybe he was someone who was angry about a number of things, and chose Tiller to take it out on.
He may not have been active in pro-life...
And he who has taken one life, even Tiller’s, has murdered the whole world.
If just ONE babys life is saved by Tillers death, that is a good thing.
The cliches aside this will cause a net loss of life. As another poster mentioned the pro-life movement was really beginning to gain some ground. This will hurt that and that will cost lives.
As the Jewish proverb goes He who has saved one life has saved the whole world.
That's from the Koran. :(
And if many babies lives are lost due to the political fallout and the marginalization of the pro-life cause, is it a good thing. If the power of the statist now running the show in every aspect of everybody's life is strengthened, is that a good thing as well?