Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BONNER/DAVIS: Up in the air on refueling
Washington Times ^ | June 2, 2009 | Reps. Jo Bonner and Artur Davis

Posted on 06/01/2009 7:58:02 PM PDT by jazusamo

The Air Force is moving forward with yet another Request for Proposal (RFP) to replace the ever-aging KC-135 aerial refueling tanker.

The Pentagon has been in the process of replacing the tanker since 2001. These aircraft are 50 years old on average and are showing the strain of their age. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates has declared it a strategic priority to modernize these tankers for a new century's threats.

Yet, eight years later, a new tanker has not been built, and the acquisition process is mired in Washington politics. Our potential adversaries are watching while we debate and delay. As members of Congress and advocates for the war fighter, we would like to offer some thoughts from this side of the Potomac River.

• Build on the original RFP that worked. Build on RFP that was issued Jan. 30, 2007, after being thoroughly vetted through three publicly issued drafts. The 150-person Department of Defense (DoD) source selection team invested tens of thousands of hours in crafting that RFP and understanding the competitor's proposals. Don't throw away its work.

The Government Accountability Office found a grand total of eight discrepancies in the handling of that RFP out of the 111 complaints in the Boeing Co.'s protest. Rather than begin anew, the Air Force should tweak the RFP to address those eight GAO issues, and then we should move forward with the source selection.

To go back to square one to create a new RFP would add years - and millions of additional dollars - to the process. Nothing in the GAO findings demands a restart from scratch.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: airforce; boeing; northrop; tankers

1 posted on 06/01/2009 7:58:02 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

good grief.


2 posted on 06/01/2009 8:03:16 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sarah Palin-Liz Cheney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Who has a union giving money to Democrats?

That is who deserves to win.


3 posted on 06/01/2009 8:08:39 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

I guess it’s being rigged for Boeing.


4 posted on 06/01/2009 8:15:57 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sarah Palin-Liz Cheney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Everything I’ve read says that AB wins this one by a mile.
Their aircraft is much better, by nearly every measure.

Guess that means that O gives it Boeing.


5 posted on 06/01/2009 8:48:01 PM PDT by Wiseghy ("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wiseghy

I know a lot of time has been wasted and they’d better settle on one or the other. The AF needs these tankers and so far it’s been a real fiasco.


6 posted on 06/01/2009 9:04:14 PM PDT by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson