You are straying from the topic, and debating things that are not part of the theory of evolutionI guess you don't know what the word colloquial means.
The pond scum question is a common misconception. [excerpt]
From the 14 points: [excerpt]Still trying to change the subject I see.
As far as the entire microevolution vs macroevolution rabbit trail, I have asked you several times to explain your understanding of the difference between the two. [excerpt]It depends on how you want to define micro.
Microevolution and macroevolution are both forms of evolution … [excerpt]Would those both be upward evolution?
Which of the 14 points do you have a problem with, and what evidence do you have to support your position? [excerpt]Objectivity first, points later.
I guess you don’t know what the word colloquial means.
Oops my bad I missed that part, sorry about that.
Well how do you define micro?
Accepting microevolution and not accepting macroevolution is like saying I believe in atoms but I do not believe in protons.
And where in the 14 points does it state the evolution must be upward?