Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Danger of One-Party Rule in Washington (Pat Toomey)
The Harvard Crimson ^ | 6/3/09 | Pat Toomey

Posted on 06/04/2009 5:13:48 PM PDT by Born Conservative

It is natural for political parties to seek power. As a Republican, I root for Republicans to win as many elections as possible. But I hope I am objective enough to recognize that our country is often ill-served by the concentration of political power in one party’s hands, regardless of which party holds it.

Our nation’s founders clearly saw this danger. In Federalist 51, James Madison defended the virtue of divided government: “If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.”

Madison and his brethren brilliantly sought to limit the danger of one-party factionalism by establishing a political system with numerous checks and balances. But even with obstacles in place, political leaders frequently run amok when power is concentrated in the hands of one party.

American history is replete with examples. The complete Republican federal dominance after the Civil War led to an overzealous Congress in the Reconstruction Period and massive corruption in President Grant’s administration. Democratic one-party rule from the early 1930s until the mid ‘40s culminated in sclerotic post-World War II policies that failed to account for the vast changes in our country, and once more, to massive cronyism and corruption.

(Excerpt) Read more at thecrimson.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: onepartyrule; pattoomey; realconservatives; toomey

1 posted on 06/04/2009 5:13:48 PM PDT by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
The best government is a divided government
2 posted on 06/04/2009 5:23:21 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

It’s more an indictment of politicians who do not have a core set of ethicial beliefs and live my them. A single policical party in power would be wonderful if run by policians with such character.


3 posted on 06/04/2009 5:25:33 PM PDT by rjones42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Absolutely, regardless of the party that’s in power.


4 posted on 06/04/2009 5:26:14 PM PDT by Born Conservative (Bohicaville: http://bohicaville.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

We already have one party rule. The Republicans and the Democrats are the same party.


5 posted on 06/04/2009 5:27:50 PM PDT by nonliberal (Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Ping


6 posted on 06/04/2009 5:33:12 PM PDT by Born Conservative (Bohicaville: http://bohicaville.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
The Danger of One-Party Rule in Washington

To the totalitarian, there is no danger if your party is the one-party.

I understand Toomey's point, but more and more Americans don't want anything other than their turn at the government teat. The best way to accomplish that is with one party that gives the most in exchange for the least.

The fact that this is parasitic and unsustainable is irrelevant. The fact that their greed is killing the goose that lays the gold eggs is immaterial. The fact that their liberties will be devoured permanently in exchange for temporary gain is untroubling.

Most ----- Americans ----- don't ----- care.

7 posted on 06/04/2009 5:34:07 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (Oh, well. Back to the drawing board....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Toomey needs to run his figures again. The GOP lost the Senate in 2001 and regained it in 2003.


8 posted on 06/04/2009 7:15:47 PM PDT by rmlew ( The SAVE and GIVE acts are institutioning Corvee. Where's the outtrage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ...

ping


9 posted on 06/05/2009 7:42:06 AM PDT by Tribune7 (Better to convert enemies to allies than to destroy them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson