Skip to comments.
“Junk” DNA: Darwinism’s Last Stand?
Discovery Institute ^
| June 4, 2009
| Jonathan Wells, Ph.D.
Posted on 06/05/2009 8:25:33 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: Fichori
Well, since you know the right way to creatio ex nihilo, why don't you do a demonstration? Because I am not God nor do I play god as the authors of the bible did.
41
posted on
06/05/2009 7:43:38 PM PDT
by
Jeff Gordon
(I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
To: metmom
Thanks for the links, dear sister in Christ!
To: Jeff Gordon
Because I am not God nor do I play god as the authors of the bible did.
So you're just jealous that God has the guts to claim to be God and you don't?
Or are you just mad because God could
creatio ex nihilo and you can't?
Seriously, God said He is God and that He made everything, and you say that you aren't God and you didn't make anything.
Seems to me that you aren't really in any position to say He did it wrong ;-)
PS: hate to break it to you, but all documents allegedly created before you were born are fake. They were created to deceive you by the author. Sorry.
43
posted on
06/05/2009 8:35:25 PM PDT
by
Fichori
To: Fichori
So you're just jealous that God has the guts to claim to be God and you don't? Nods and smiles.
44
posted on
06/05/2009 9:02:33 PM PDT
by
Jeff Gordon
(I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
To: Jeff Gordon
A competent god would have got it done in the first Planck Second and let his laws of physics take it from there.
Are you saying He did not, "get it right the first time" or are you saying that going by your own (limited) understanding of Him, that He, the Creator --- is incompetent???
haarump!
Go get your own dirt.
45
posted on
06/05/2009 11:13:55 PM PDT
by
BlueDragon
(and wipe that smug smirk off your face while you're at it....)
To: BlueDragon
I am saying the the Creationists' god is incompetent. He was not able to set some initial conditions for the universe and then let everything evolve from that. He had to design various forms of life and then put them onto the earth like animals into a zoo.
Note: The god of the Creationists is not to be confused with any real god. The Creationists god come from the imagination of some bronze age men who made up the biblical stories. The real God is a wonder to behold.
46
posted on
06/05/2009 11:37:31 PM PDT
by
Jeff Gordon
(I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
To: Jeff Gordon
The real God is a wonder to behold.
How would you know?
Here you say that the "creationist's God" is merely a product of the "imagination of some bronze age men who made up... stories."
Then you say that the "real" God is a wonder "to behold". Well then, what did He look like?
Or is it that you are substituting some vague conception of "God" to me here, that is much the product of your own imagination (and limited understanding)?
47
posted on
06/06/2009 12:04:01 AM PDT
by
BlueDragon
(the ante is on the table)
To: BlueDragon
All of our gods are figments of our imaginations. There is no way of knowing, really knowing, the characteristics of God. We imgaine our gods in our image and likeness
My God is smart enough to have created all that is and all that will be in the first Planck Second. My God is not the type of guy who orders the killing all the first born of a nation. My God is not the type of guy would require that his son be tortured to death. The mean, vicious god of the bible is not someone that I would even want to know.
48
posted on
06/06/2009 12:12:25 AM PDT
by
Jeff Gordon
(I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
To: Jeff Gordon
Your side, including you, demands to babble endlessly that God has nothing to do with it, has no place in science...blah blah blah.
Try again.
49
posted on
06/06/2009 4:35:35 AM PDT
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for g!ood men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: Jeff Gordon
All of our gods are figments of our imaginations. There is no way of knowing, really knowing, the characteristics of God. We imgaine our gods in our image and likeness My God is smart enough to have created all that is and all that will be in the first Planck Second. My God is not the type of guy who orders the killing all the first born of a nation. My God is not the type of guy would require that his son be tortured to death. The mean, vicious god of the bible is not someone that I would even want to know.
I would suggest getting some help with reading comprehension. But seriously, how about a Christ-centered church to lend you a hand? If I were you, I wouldn't allow satan to play me like a fiddle like that.
50
posted on
06/06/2009 4:42:32 AM PDT
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for g!ood men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: Jeff Gordon; metmom
Why arent there giant animals flyng by now?
Because it was not in God's plan. The plan God had when he created all that is in the first Planck Second of this universe.
Thanks, but in all seriousness, we already knew evos didn't have a clue in the first place, even though they pretend as though somehow they DO have all the answers that no one else understands.
51
posted on
06/06/2009 4:49:37 AM PDT
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for g!ood men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: tpanther; Jeff Gordon
Thanks, but in all seriousness, we already knew evos didn't have a clue in the first place, even though they pretend as though somehow they DO have all the answers that no one else understands. Even when they're not scientific answers.
You gotta love how evos posit all kinds of answers for things and when they can't give a *natural* explanation, they go on and explain how the God they deny as being relevant to science, did it.
52
posted on
06/06/2009 6:06:11 AM PDT
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: tpanther
Your side, including you, demands to babble endlessly that God has nothing to do with it, has no place in science...blah blah blah. Take another look. I have never said that God has nothing to do with it.
53
posted on
06/06/2009 11:21:33 AM PDT
by
Jeff Gordon
(I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
To: tpanther
If I were you, I wouldn't allow satan to play me like a fiddle like that. If you were me you would not be fear mongering with this mythical Satan character.
54
posted on
06/06/2009 11:26:16 AM PDT
by
Jeff Gordon
(I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
To: tpanther
they pretend as though somehow they DO have all the answers that no one else understands. Name one. Just one. Any one.
55
posted on
06/06/2009 11:31:01 AM PDT
by
Jeff Gordon
(I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
To: metmom
they go on and explain how the God they deny as being relevant to science, did it. Please play nice. You know very well that you and I are not talking about the same god. Being disingenuous does not further the debate.
56
posted on
06/06/2009 11:33:39 AM PDT
by
Jeff Gordon
(I don't trust Obama with my country. Do you?)
To: Travis T. OJustice
Science isn't stupid. Sience is simply a set of methods for investigating the world around us. This whole "debate"(sic) is becoming quite tiresome. No reasonable man would expect that Darwin, making the best guesses he could with 19th century knowledge, would have the final answers. Ditto Watson and Crick 40 years ago.
Studies of the physiology of the body shows plainly that there are inefficiencies and leftover adaptations which could have been designed better by a competent fluids engineer. So the probablility that pieces of DNA have been bypassed means little as to the ultimate question.
To: tpanther
Why arent there giant animals flyng by now? Because it would violate various laws of physics. Actually, a giant flying animal would be a pretty good argument for creationism. Why aren't there any?
To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
pterodactyls...had a rather enormous wing span according to fossils, and yet evolution doesn’t, over ga-jillions of years, account for other equally larger animals flyng such as pterodactyls did, why is that?
59
posted on
06/06/2009 1:04:10 PM PDT
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for g!ood men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
To: Jeff Gordon
If I were you I’d get down on my knees, and be more humble, but in the end, you’re you, you’ll account for you, not me.
60
posted on
06/06/2009 1:09:32 PM PDT
by
tpanther
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for g!ood men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson