Skip to comments.
Calif. contemplating rewrite of social contract (i.e. they're thinking about cutting welfare)
Associated Press ^
| June 7, 2009
| Judy Lin
Posted on 06/07/2009 12:15:44 PM PDT by Zakeet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: Zakeet
100% of all welfare should be eliminated!
41
posted on
06/07/2009 2:11:07 PM PDT
by
dalereed
To: Myrddin
Change the ruling of the law and declare all anchor babies illegal ailens!
42
posted on
06/07/2009 2:13:37 PM PDT
by
dalereed
To: fanfan
She thinks waiting for handouts is her job.
43
posted on
06/07/2009 2:13:50 PM PDT
by
achilles2000
(Shouting "fire" in a burning building is doing everyone a favor...whether they like it or not)
To: Syncro
Yes, there is an enormous amount of fraud What's needed for SSI, is for the fraud to be rooted out. But that would step on toes and likely be deemed racist.
44
posted on
06/07/2009 2:14:30 PM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
To: PapaBear3625
You betcha!
Not only that, but it would put a big dent in the democrat voting base.
45
posted on
06/07/2009 2:16:08 PM PDT
by
Syncro
To: Lancey Howard
It [government] doesnt even really provide services to the middle class. He added: You have to cut where the money is. Wasn't Rush saying something a month or two ago about how welfare costs break down to 70% administrative and 30% to the purported beneficaries?
Comports with something I saw in NR in about 1980: In 1976 (the last year for which figures were available at the time), federal poverty aid cost enough to give every poor person (not family -- person) in the country $20,000 for the year. I was in grad school at the time (making $3,000 a year on a teaching stipend, plus whatever I could make on summer jobs), so I don't know what a "normal" salary was then. I'm guessing it wasn't $20,000.
For CA, I'm guessing those welfare workers are unionized and won't be laid off.
46
posted on
06/07/2009 2:18:39 PM PDT
by
maryz
To: dalereed
I have a rental property which I accept Section-8. What an eye opener!
Looking for a new tenant and this woman applied
She was approved for $1050 per month although she worked, had a daughter 19yrs old, not handicapped and not working. Drove a late model car....better than mine!
She didn't qualify because her voucher was only for a two bedroom and my house had three.
Why in the world was this woman getting any welfare benefits for twenty years?
47
posted on
06/07/2009 2:32:43 PM PDT
by
mickie
To: mickie
I do work on one that is a 3 beedroom,3 bath that they are payinf $1,850 and the tennant only poays $50, it’s criminal!
48
posted on
06/07/2009 2:39:22 PM PDT
by
dalereed
To: Zakeet
I checked. You can get SCHIP in California even if you make over $100,000 per year. You can actually be filthy stinkin' rich deriving your income from investments and still get SCHIP. Cut some of these programs for "poor" families? Maybe actually restrict them to POOR families.
The 22-year-old single mother said she is looking for a job and does not qualify for benefits herself because she crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally as a teenager.
And yet LEGAL aliens are not allowed means-tested aid.
To: omega4179
You want another 109 million peasants under our flag to demand health care and welfare?They'll all be here sooner or later, anyway.
To: Zakeet
“The 22-year-old single mother said she is looking for a job and does not qualify for benefits herself because she crossed the U.S.-Mexico border illegally as a teenager. She doesn’t know what she will do if core state assistance is eliminated for her daughter.”
Maybe she can be a “wise Latina woman” and haul her unmarried baby making butt back across the border to her true homeland?
51
posted on
06/07/2009 3:39:15 PM PDT
by
MissouriConservative
(Let the purging of the RINOs begin in 2010. - MissouriConservative)
To: Zakeet
I didn't even know we had a "contract" as if we, the offended party, had a say in it.....
OTOH....the underlings of society are easy targets...how about the over paid fat arces that occupy all the govt jobs....
cut the govt jobs, just a little, and reduce their benefits and pensions, even just a little, and the budget would right itself....
52
posted on
06/07/2009 10:02:49 PM PDT
by
cherry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson