Try to avoid the pitfalls of other posters in attacking me personally, and deal with the media worship of Obama, the economic crisis, the non-stop lying of Bush haters, the lack of a VP candidate, the incredible weakness of the 'moderate' McCain and his campaign against Bush and not Obama.....
Until you factor ALL of the issues, your persistence in blaming Bush's PR for that which it was, at very best only partially responsible, and factually, very minimally, makes your argument less than weak. It is indefensible.
I have addressed the full argument. It is you who have chosen to center on Bush and not the plethora of factual evidence refuting your narrow focus of blame.
Forgive this convoluted sentence. I hope its meaning is clear.
(FR needs an edit feature....)
“Interesting that you call me a weak debater when you have not even begun to address the historic factors in the election”
Actually, when there is agreement on a point in a debate, there is certainly no need to debate that point.
We have agreement there there were many factors that led to the Dem route. Your reluctance to find any blame on the sitting US President is astonishing. Emotionalism from a liberal or a conservative is still emotionalism.