Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Administration About to Say Which Banks Can Repay Bailout Cash
CNSNews ^ | June 9, 2009 | Stevenson Jacobs and Daniel Wagner

Posted on 06/09/2009 11:14:46 AM PDT by ClassicLiberal

The government is set to announce as early as Tuesday morning which of the country's biggest banks will be able to repay billions in federal bailout dollars in a decision that risks creating a two-tier banking system -- winners and losers.

Congress approved the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program eight months ago as financial markets teetered on collapse. Almost ever since, banks have been eager to pay back bailout money and cut the federal strings that come with it.

Combined, the repayments could exceed $50 billion. Experts say that figure reflects a measure of stability that has returned to the banking system but caution that the crisis isn't over. Some worry the repayments could widen the gap between healthy and weak banks.

"We're going to find out who are the strongest kids on the block and who are not," said Bert Ely, a longtime banking analyst.

Banks started railing against the TARP almost immediately after they accepted the help. One CEO, Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase & Co., called the money a "scarlet letter," referring to the public backlash and federal scrutiny that came with it.

Banks that are expected to get a green light to repay bailout funds include JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and American Express Co. They would be free of federal rules ranging from caps on executive pay to restrictions on dividend payments.

But weaker banks such as Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp. would remain tethered to the government and face a problem -- how to compete for business and top workers against rivals operating more freely.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agenda; animalfarm; bankingbailout; bho44; bigbrother; control; cultureofcorruption; democrats; democratscandals; economy; nationalization; obama; obamunism

1 posted on 06/09/2009 11:14:46 AM PDT by ClassicLiberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal

“Which banks can...”

Can???

As in “are able to” or “will be allowed to by their government overseers”


2 posted on 06/09/2009 11:18:17 AM PDT by icwhatudo (For every clinic bombed or burned, 17 to 18 churches are burned down. MSM? MSM?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal

The important point is that the repayment of the Bail-Out money will be in funny money.

Another scam deal for his friends.


3 posted on 06/09/2009 11:18:54 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Once a Republic, Now a State, Still Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal
Heh. Funny how when the banks were falling all over themselves to get this bailout money they never even considered having conditions that entailed paying it back to be removed from the bill, even though they pulled out all the stops to get the money in the first place.

Methinks that a lot of these banks thought this was going to be "free" money.

4 posted on 06/09/2009 11:20:10 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal

Please Mr. Man, let me pay you back . . . . . .


5 posted on 06/09/2009 11:21:44 AM PDT by DeaconRed (We have a STUPID president. He wants a Czar for everything. We only need a Comon Sense Leader. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal
guess the purpose was served - he can now control them without the banks owing him money - might as well take the money back and pass it to acorn
6 posted on 06/09/2009 11:24:59 AM PDT by sloop (pfc in the quiet civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

I think it was which ones would be allowed to pay it back. I heard something this morning about the rules behind rewritten and the bar (defining healthy banks) being raised. It may have been someone’s fear rather than a plan; I don’t know.


7 posted on 06/09/2009 11:32:26 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal

Two groups: Those who paid to play and those who haven’t yet.


8 posted on 06/09/2009 11:38:06 AM PDT by hoosiermama (Hey hey! Ho ho! Where's your Birth Certificate/ We've a right to know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal
Let's see now... the man that runs Citi is Obama's wealthy arab bud, so Citi won't care if they are OWNED.

Obama is playing favorites mixing business and government. It can't have a good ending no matter what.

9 posted on 06/09/2009 11:40:04 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal
Banks started railing against the TARP almost immediately after they accepted the help. One CEO, Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase & Co., called the money a "scarlet letter," referring to the public backlash and federal scrutiny that came with it.
They never should have accepted such a Faustian deal.
They brought it upon themselves.
The only question is if American business has learned the hard lessons German businesses learned when they entered into a similar pact in the 1930s.
10 posted on 06/09/2009 11:43:22 AM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal

IF I win the Lottery and decide to pay off mortgages for my neices and nephews, I WILL do such.

There is no such thing as a President interferring with a bank or other business repaying a LOAN when it has the opportunity to do so.

Does Big Ears think he hs going to tell these banks that even if they have the money to pay back the loans that Big Ears and his Oval Office and “transparent administration of crooks and liars’ is going to tell a bank they cannot repay a loan???

Here comes more work for the Supremes!!!

The Supremes could have avoided all the messes \which are coming down the road by questioning the birth certificate 10 months ago.


11 posted on 06/09/2009 11:44:25 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal

those which put Obama cronies in control of their borads?


12 posted on 06/09/2009 11:46:14 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClassicLiberal
They are: JPMorgan Chase, American Express, Goldman Sachs Group, U.S. Bancorp, Capital One Financial, Bank of New York Mellon, State Street and BB&T.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/31184354

13 posted on 06/09/2009 2:28:19 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson