Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wardaddy; Anti-Bubba182; Dayton3
I'm surprised the PC-Cons haven't yet mentioned that "Martin Luther King was a Republican." Or haven't yet suggested that all we need to do is remind blacks of "the racist history of the Democratic Party" and they'll come roaring over to our side.

We got into this mess in the first place because Republicans brilliantly fell for the argument that race doesn't matter forty-something years ago. Why, America could be 77% black Muslims from the Third World and it wouldn't make a dime's worth of difference. They'd still relate to our Founding Fathers and our history of capitalism and religious liberty. They'd have landed America on the moon in 1969, right on schedule, if they'd come here in 1803 and picked up on Jeffersonian ideals.

So we bought that nonsense, as did the Tories in Britain, and the conservative parties throughout the Western world. And we now have decades of proof that it isn't true, but people still insist that if we only had the right message, we could turn Detroit and East Los Angeles into hotbeds of Republican conservatism.

Anti-Bubba, you wrote:

You won't get enough percentage of the White people to get and maintain power. As a matter of fact if it was attempted the party would actually lose Whites who would not want to be associated with the tactic.

Those were not projections I posted, they were actual percentages of White voters in Presidential elections. The electorate is not getting Whiter. Long term, minorities have to be recruited or the GOP is the new Whig party.

What you're basically saying is that white voters are so imprinted with liberalism that they would rather see America become a Third World nation than be perceived as racist. Note that I said perceived, because there is actually nothing racist about defending oneself against racial aggression. So millions of whites will continue to defer to the Obamas and the Sotomayors as they overtly work to promote the interests of non-whites at the expense of whites. They'll do this on the grounds that resistance would be an immoral tactic they wouldn't want to be associated with.

Well, you're probably right. Which is why at some point the nation will probably balkanize and that will be the end of the American experiment, assuming it isn't over already.

You can just forget about winning non-whites, because with the exception of some Asian groups which aren't all that big, it's a lost cause. So, in all likelihood, is America.

47 posted on 06/14/2009 10:10:50 PM PDT by puroresu (Enjoy ASIAN CINEMA? See my Freeper page for recommendations (REALLY & TRULY updated!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: puroresu
"What you're basically saying is that white voters are so imprinted with liberalism that they would rather see America become a Third World nation than be perceived as racist.... "

I said no such thing and go screw yourself for suggesting it. Being against racism and Jim Crow does not make one a liberal. The historical precedents for a White party strategy are parties like the Dixiecrats or American Independent Party, both defeated decisively in much Whiter times.

48 posted on 06/14/2009 10:24:17 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson