The Darwinists are now trying to redefine “special”.
“Analyzing the politics of climate change
Friday, June 12, 2009 11:56:27 AM · 21 of 22
freedumb2003 to count-your-change
If anyone can’t imply you are using it as a strawman, then they are as ill-informed as you. I was trying to make it clear that YOU are saying people who know science use that argument — which was your point (unless I am mistaken).
Trust me, quote-mining is what creationists do.
As I said, your strawman won’t hunt. You can play it over and over and it never changes. AGW and TToE are completely different in terms of science and all your misunderstanding, misinformation and conspiracy-nut creationist sites won’t change that.
And you certainly are not worth my time, but other people read these threads and I want them to know that most Conservatives understand science, know the difference between real science, such as TToE, and fad science, like AGW, and no science at all, like creationism.
This is for them, not you.”
What!??!
You and your ilk need to be “special,” so you invest heavily in this “I am closer to God because I reject science” nonsense.
Well, you are special all right.
“There is a personality type that needs to be “special” (usually a as result of being ignored or abused as a child). These people look for niche opportunities to make themselves “special” to make up for the attention they didn’t get as children.”