Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: calex59

I don’t get it. Didn’t the mullahs pick all of the “candidates”?. Mousavi, Ahmahdangnutjob...what’s the diff?? As for the protests, that’s like protesting you got Hitler instead of Mussolini. I can understanding Iranians protesting. They’ve got a lot to be furious about. But are they protesting the fact that their election was a crock, or that they didn’t get the despot of their choice? Color me confused.


39 posted on 06/14/2009 6:01:55 AM PDT by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: mewzilla
Mousavi and Ahmadinejad are basically the same as far as foreign policy. Mousavi, on the other hand, is very liberal on social policies internal to Iran, like de-Islamifying a lot of the strict rules that govern daily life. Holding hands with women in public, having religious police on patrol, etc.

In theory, a more open and free society would eventually back down from a more aggressive foreign policy, so Mousavi is better for us in the long term. But he's no angel; he's a thug bastard from way back, with a long bloody history within the government.

So, the differences are cosmetic in the short term, but may be pronounced in the long term.

40 posted on 06/14/2009 6:10:13 AM PDT by Steel Wolf (Oh, well. Back to the drawing board....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson