Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rally calls for change in tax system(Rally For The Fair Tax)
Columbia Tribune ^ | June 14, 2009 | T.J. Greaney

Posted on 06/15/2009 12:22:56 PM PDT by Man50D

A daylong rally in support of replacing the federal income tax with a 23 percent retail sales tax drew thousands to the Boone County Fairgrounds yesterday.

In the style of a Southern revival meeting, a series of speakers took the stage to rail against a government they see as recklessly speeding toward socialism and mortgaging the wealth of future generations in the process.

Nearly all interviewed for this story believe it is high time to put the Internal Revenue Service out of business.

“Our tax code right now is a man-caused disaster,” said Neal Boortz, a nationally syndicated radio host who has advocated a “fair tax” over the income tax for more than 25 years. “It is in every respect an act of terror against the working people of this country.”

Another speaker, U.S. Rep. John Linder, R-Ga., is co-sponsor of a bill in Congress to institute the national sales tax and mused about what he would do with the approximately 105,000 employees of the IRS when they’re no longer needed. “I say put them on the Mexican border holding hands,” the congressman said to laughter from the crowd of about 2,000 inside the fairground arena.

Proponents contend the new tax would be revenue neutral, not taking money away from existing federal programs. It also would include a monthly rebate check for all taxpayers known as a “prebate,” which equal the average spending by someone living at the poverty level to ensure no one is taxed on necessities. They also contend the federal sales tax would not significantly increase the cost of goods because corporations already pass along federal taxes to consumers as “embedded costs” in everything from cans of Coca-Cola to new cars.

“If the fair tax was your reality, and somebody came along and tried to sell you on the income tax and withholding and the death tax, you’d laugh them out of town,” Boortz said in an interview. “Either that, or you’d string them up. It’s one of the two.”

Many in the crowd wore clothing emblazoned with the fair tax logo or the American flag and toted newly purchased books on the subject. One woman, Kerri Martin of Jefferson City, held a sign reading, “Who is John Galt?” — referring to a character from Ayn Rand’s novel “Atlas Shrugged.” Martin said the character embodies “the spirit and power of the individual.”

“We’ve got to remember, it’s our money we earn. It’s not someone else’s to spend,” said Martin, who with her husband runs a title company. “And this would give us some control. It’s a very ingenious plan.”

A booth run by Columbia gun-rights advocate Tim Oliver advertised introductory courses on owning and carrying concealed weapons. He was doing a brisk business.

“They’re sort of kindred spirits, if you will,” Oliver said of people who support the fair tax and the Second Amendment. Oliver then told a reporter to look around and asked who in the group of about 40 people near his booth did not have a concealed carry permit. “Almost all of them” do, he said. “And just like all polite people and all polite company, nobody’s ever going to know” they’re carrying weapons.

Glenn Chastonay of Moberly drove to the rally along with his wife and father. Chastonay intalls hood hinges for Dura Automotive Systems and recently had to endure a mandatory one-month furlough because of the economic slowdown. His wife, Joyce, recently lost her job, and both are angry that the government is using their tax dollars to bailout corporations. They’d rather keep all the money they earn.

“What about the billion dollars they gave to AIG, and those guys got bonuses? And I’m struggling to put food on the table and pay all my bills,” Chastonay said. “That’s our money. The tax money doesn’t come from the government; it comes from us.”

His father, Ruel Chastonay, a retired IBM employee from Jefferson City, said the tax system has become an overgrown monster. “I do my taxes every year and it’s an onerous task,” he said of the two days he spends tabulating his dues. “And they change it every year; not to help me, but to put in some loophole or to help some lobbyist.”

Advocates including Boortz said the choice for people is between being taxed on “33 percent of everything you earn or 23 percent of everything you spend.” The federal income tax rate he cited refers to the marginal tax rate on some of the top earners in the country. The median household income in Boone County, however, is about $45,000, meaning those families pay federal income tax of about 15 percent.

A study conducted by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy said the middle 20 percent of Missouri’s income distribution, those with an average income of $37,000, would see an average tax increase of $2,036 under the fair tax.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fairtax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 06/15/2009 12:22:56 PM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Taxman; Principled; EternalVigilance; phil_will1; kevkrom; Bigun; PeteB570; FBD; Voter#537; ...
Fair Tax ping!


2 posted on 06/15/2009 12:23:46 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

“A daylong rally in support of replacing the federal income tax with a 23 percent retail sales tax drew thousands to the Boone County Fairgrounds yesterday.”

23% is a shocking number.


3 posted on 06/15/2009 12:25:53 PM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
23% is a shocking number.

The shocker is your paying more than 53% when you total the 23% embedded income taxes people pay in everything they purchase and don't realize it, along with the fact most people fall into the 15% income tax bracket, plus the 7.65% payroll tax and the 7.65% employer matching. I'll take the 23% rate any day over our total tax burden with the income tax.
4 posted on 06/15/2009 12:31:30 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Boy, I think FairTax people are suckers.

And 23% sales tax, on top of the rising State legislated sales taxes.

And why suckers? Because we’ll end up with a national VAT/Sales Tax on TOP of all the other taxes.

FairTaxers may o regret their ennabling actions to the tax crowd.


5 posted on 06/15/2009 12:31:53 PM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
And 23% sales tax, on top of the rising State legislated sales taxes.

We're suckers now for the reason stated in post #4 not to mention a heavy progressive tax on income is one of the planks in Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto.

And why suckers? Because we’ll end up with a national VAT/Sales Tax on TOP of all the other taxes.

If you bothered to do your homework on the Fair Tax you would realize the Fair Tax is not a VAT! It will impose the tax only at the point of sale and remove all the embedded VATs in everything we purchase. You would also understand The Fair Tax Act(HR25/S296) will replace all federal income taxes with a national sales tax and abolish the IRS.
6 posted on 06/15/2009 12:37:06 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC
23% is a shocking number

And is shockingly misleading. The real rate is 30%.

I still wonder why these guys hide that fact that it's a 30% tax, not 23% (29.87 actually). If you pay $1.00 for a item, and 23 cents are tax, the tax rate is 23/77 or .2987.

If it was such a good idea, why not be honest about how you calculate the rate? No other sales tax rate in this country is calculated the way the Fair Taxers do it.

If they got rid of the Income Tax, it might be reasonable to add a sales tax, but only if they don't make the same mistake. The second biggest Income Tax mistake was in not creating a 10% limit in the enabling amendment (right after the mistake of allowing it in the first place). Without such a limit on the Fair Tax, we'll have the same problem of rates creeping up on us.

And then there's the dishonesty of the prebate. For all the talk about Fairness, and ease of use, you still have government socialist intrusion into your life to figure out and give out the prebate.

7 posted on 06/15/2009 12:40:20 PM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard work to be cynical enough in this age)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DonaldC

Before being shocked, please take some time to review the plan in greater detail. That tax rate is said to represent the current level of embedded taxes in purchases of new goods in the US economy. Those embedded taxes include the taxes paid by the various businesses responsible for manufacturing, transporting, distributing, and retailing those goods and services. There is still a lot of misunderstanding about the Fair Tax, but it is certainly a better plan than the current mechanism we have in place.


8 posted on 06/15/2009 12:41:07 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Fine, it’s not a vat but a national sales tax.

My point remains, the fair tax will end up superimposed on the existing tax structure.

It’s a Trojan Horse for a national sales tax.

I do not believe our venerated legislators will give up any revenue stream. They will happily impose the FT on top of our current IRS structure.


9 posted on 06/15/2009 12:48:01 PM PDT by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: slowhandluke; DonaldC
And is shockingly misleading. The real rate is 30%.

Once again the uninformed spreading misinformation. The 23% rate replaces the nearly 23% of embedded taxes in all products we purchase under the income tax code. Example: A $100 item today has 23%($23 rounded up) of embedded taxes. The actual cost is $77. It's known as the tax inclusive rate.

That same $23 will be applied as the tax on a $77 item under The Fair Tax(23/77=.30). It's know as the tax exclusive rate. The amount of tax collected($23) will be the same regardless of which rate is quoted.
10 posted on 06/15/2009 12:55:53 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
My point remains, the fair tax will end up superimposed on the existing tax structure.

Try actually reading the bill. You will understand it will prevent that from occurring.

I do not believe our venerated legislators will give up any revenue stream.

That's right! They won't give it up! Thats' why there is a growing grassroots effort to force them to accept The Fair tax or understand they risk losing their jobs. The 76 cosponsors last session and the 59 so far this session are a direct result of that pressure.
11 posted on 06/15/2009 1:00:10 PM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Your Nightmare; Always Right; lewislynn; lucysmom; robertpaulsen; Filo; longtermmemmory; ...

Just not enough abuse for one day, eh?


12 posted on 06/15/2009 1:10:54 PM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhandluke

Nine trillion dollars later, by the FT’s own claculations, the tax would have to be 57% (75% like Denmark if you add healthcare spending)


13 posted on 06/15/2009 1:12:56 PM PDT by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
"a 23 percent retail sales tax"

Yeah, that's just what I want.

14 posted on 06/15/2009 1:14:06 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Big Ears + Big Spending --> BigEarMarx, the man behind TOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Good one. Been through this stuff before, nothing new here. No matter what the bill **says**, if the 16th Amendment is not outright repealed, then we will end up with both an income tax PLUS a ‘fair tax’. That’s the way the assholes in DC work.


15 posted on 06/15/2009 1:18:51 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

None of the problems mentioned are wrong.

Just the proposed solution. . . and really just parts of it.


16 posted on 06/15/2009 1:24:46 PM PDT by Filo (Darwin was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
“It also would include a monthly rebate check for all taxpayers known as a “prebate,” which equal the average spending by someone living at the poverty level to ensure no one is taxed on necessities.”

What a great idea, that is, if everyone wants to live at THE POVERTY LEVEL!

17 posted on 06/15/2009 1:28:04 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
I do not believe our venerated legislators will give up any revenue stream. They will happily impose the FT on top of our current IRS structure.

That's where you come in. It's up to you and all other freedom-loving Americans to stand up and make sure it works out they way we want it to.

18 posted on 06/15/2009 1:44:57 PM PDT by foxfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I have paid income tax my entire life, saved for retirement, and now that my income will stop, and I will spend my saving, you want to tax consumption.

Perfect


19 posted on 06/15/2009 1:47:07 PM PDT by herbg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Nine trillion dollars later, by the FT’s own claculations, the tax would have to be 57%

That's right. A 57% sales tax would smack most consumers right in the face. So would a 23% tax for that matter. Most taxpayers could use a big smak in the face though because most of them have no idea what they pay in taxes under the current system.

20 posted on 06/15/2009 1:50:14 PM PDT by foxfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson