Lies, Damned Lies and BBC Climate Reports

When the global warming alarmist house of cards finally collapses, exposing the pseudo-science/scare-journalism axis that has perpetrated the world's greatest mass delusion, among the first led out into the public square for ritual humiliation ought to be BBC ‘science' and ‘environment' correspondents.

Firstly, for submitting fraudulent CV's to BBC Human Resources claiming they actually knew something about science. Secondly, for asserting, as public service (public-paid) broadcasters, that they were only reporting ‘what scientists were saying'.

No doubt they will also adopt the same mitigation Scoop's William Boot called upon - that they were really only Gardening Correspondents who took a wrong turn in the BBC corridor one day. They will claim that their news editors ‘water-boarded' destroying their ‘testicular fortitude' thereby forcing them to concoct a veritable cornucopia of journalistic drivel to feed the public angst. That resulting in warnings of global apocalypse via everything Everything from swine flu to SARS to the Mad Cow Disease (not to mention their ‘toxic' farts), but, mainly by employing the daddy of all scare scams: warm-mongering.

So science is turned on its head. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is reported by the BBC as a ‘pollutant' and thus all exhaling humans are ‘toxic'. Faith, not science, now prophesies that ‘higher CO2 emissions cause global warming' - even though the actual data reveals global warming ended in 1998, while CO2 emissions continued to rise. Planet Gore-ism propaganda finds a ready home displaying its wares via the ‘world's broadcaster'.

It will be the same Gore-Bull Warming brainiacs, using similar junk science, who will attempt to control your behavior via highly regulated healthcare ‘wellness’ programs. It's coming folks. Bureaucrats will determine which behaviors and which foods will be on the “OK” list.

"Firstly, for submitting fraudulent CV's to BBC Human Resources claiming they actually knew something about science. Secondly, for asserting, as public service (public-paid) broadcasters, that they were only reporting ‘what scientists were saying'."

I've always questioned the use of the word "scientist" in media articles concerning "Gore-Bull warming".

A bunch of Jr. High and high school students following around a leftwing moonbat treehugging enviro-activist masquerading as a "science" teacher and teaching these gullible children that one of the most abundant elements on earth, the building blocks of life and essential element for all plant life - CO2- is a evil pollutant.

Taking these gullible children on a field trip to the sub-arctic to witness 'global warming' ( during the brief spring melt) and telling these gullible children that spring thaws are evidence of global warming, then publishing the observations of these gullible children as "science", as indisputable eye witness observations of a "team of scientists" are just one example of the many deceitful methods used by anti- human activists, and published by their media accomplices as "scientific evidence" of global warming.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

FReepmail me to get on or off