Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: llevrok
Mr Kerry does not understand networks. First of all ATT has a 3g network that is more ubiquitous than their competitors. Furthermore, Apple has built in features that are compatible with ATT’s delivery.

It is natural that Apple would look to ATT as a distribution model so they can deliver advanced features.

It benefits the consumer and of ATT/Apple.

When the other networks have the ability to support the advanced features of the IPhone, it is likely that Apple will include them as part of their distribution model.

However, it should be noted that other manufacturers have exclusive arrangements as well. For instance, the Motorola Q9 is offered exclusively on the Sprint network.

There is a rationale for offering products and services unique to the competitor as they see advantageous in acquiring new customers and retaining them

18 posted on 06/18/2009 9:29:10 AM PDT by Vendome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vendome

IMO AT&T has not handled their iPhone deal in away that engenders customer loyalty. They didn’t have MMS ready for the launch of the 3.0 OS and their bogus refusal to allow video streaming for the SlingBox app over 3G is an insult given my expensive “unlimited” data plan. Plus Verizon just has better basic coverage overall. There will be a mass exodus if Apple ever cuts a deal with another carrier. That said, the government has no place in this type of business decision. Kerry is just trying to glom on to hot story as usual.


23 posted on 06/19/2009 7:59:21 AM PDT by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson