Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Steelfish

They should not be allowed nor should they be allowed to wear them when taking a drivers license picture.


2 posted on 06/19/2009 10:07:03 PM PDT by VicVega (Join Jihad, get captured by the US and resettled in the best places in the world. I love the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: VicVega

Applying for a driver’s license assumes the intent to actually drive. How about that headgear? What’s the peripheral vision? Is she going to be using the mesh to cover her eyes? Somehow I think that driving while wearing naqib is more dangerous than driving while texting. Face it: the whole point of this kind of garb is concealment.


22 posted on 06/19/2009 10:58:56 PM PDT by ArmyTeach ( Impossible is nothing ...Adnan Barqawi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: VicVega

Religious Freedom has never been absolute. Normally, if it doesn’t impinge upon the rights of others it is tolerated. You have a right to “Face” your accuser, if your accuser prevents that, then they lose their status of accuser.
You have a right to make personal sacrifices but you do not have the right to make others sacrifice their rights.

Take for example dietry requirements. Muslims and Jews do not eat or touch anything made from the pig. They have a right to exclude businesses that serve or prepare pork when dining out or applying for a job. They do not have a right to demand a pork free environment from those business.


29 posted on 06/20/2009 1:11:40 AM PDT by ODDITHER (HAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson