OK, I’m prepared to be entertained. So you find an article about a schism among “Temple of Darwin” adherents in one of your creation rationalization rags. Why on earth would I be moved to comment in any way other than to question the veracity and motives of the highly qualified authors and to criticize the mission of the source? The sad thing is that you and your cult bretheren actually take this and other similar crackpot sources seriously.
Are you such a sloven lapdog that you can’t even side with the Evo-theists over the Evo-atheists? Why am I not surprised!