Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Republican Infighting Matters (Savvy conservatives win, fumbling moderates get clobbered)
National Review ^ | 6/22/2009 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 06/23/2009 5:35:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: MadIsh32

“Conservatives have to allow our candidates to run as “moderates” in places like the Northeast, Western California and now Northern VA.”

ROFL! Where and when did the Mod Squad ask PERMISSION from the conservatives over who to run and how?

I somehow missed that. Time and again, the ones running in these places are moderates.

“By “moderate” I mean allow them to essentially ignore social wedge issues for the general election in these areas.”

Yeah, those issues that help us build a governing majority, instead of being a rump minority of country clubbers. Gotcha.


21 posted on 06/23/2009 8:50:35 AM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

To be perfectly honest, those issues now find us in the minority.

And really, something nobody looks at is the impact the Neo-Cons had on our movement

Fi-cons have been pushed to the corner and forgotten about.


22 posted on 06/23/2009 8:53:19 AM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: myself6

I bet you if Peter Schiff runs, he crushes Dodd in Connecticut.


23 posted on 06/23/2009 8:54:59 AM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32
I hope you are right.

Dodd...before Obama, was the epitome of DemocRAT corruption and duplicity.

24 posted on 06/23/2009 9:21:51 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32
To be perfectly honest, those issues now find us in the minority.

False.

Run real conservatives...and nuke the State Media at the same time...and they would win.

25 posted on 06/23/2009 9:23:42 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Just two nuclear bombs were enough to get Japan to surrender in World War II. It is hard to believe that it would take much more than that for the United States of America to surrender — especially with people in control of both the White House and the Congress who were for turning tail and running in Iraq just a couple of years ago.

They don't even have to drop one. Once they get theirs plus a delivery system, and make some International grab/raid we don't like, all the mullahs have to say is "Yeah, you can nuke us 'til we glow but we'll be able to get one off. You willing to trade [fill in a U.S. city] for all of Iran?

Obama & Crew, and mebba all others would fold like a tent.

26 posted on 06/23/2009 10:36:16 AM PDT by Oatka ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." –Bertrand de Jouvenel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

“Fi-cons have been pushed to the corner and forgotten about.”

What are you talking about? Talk radio is nothing but financial conservatism these days. It’s boring as blazes.

The moderates want to surrender the whole social playing field to the Democrats.


27 posted on 06/23/2009 12:39:50 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

Bwahaha.

Peter Schiff understands how to present fiscal conservativsm.

Glenn Beck does too

Rush, Sean Hannity, Levin. No sir


28 posted on 06/23/2009 5:56:09 PM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32
Which is why we have no representation in the North East now

Conservatives have to allow our candidates to run as “moderates” in places like the Northeast, Western California and now Northern VA.

By “moderate” I mean allow them to essentially ignore social wedge issues for the general election in these areas.

IMHO, you missed the show. They knocked off mostly RINOs in the Northeast with more liberal rats starting in 2006. In the rest of the country, the rats moved to the right running pro Second Amendment and prolife candidates like Casey in PA.

29 posted on 06/23/2009 8:33:07 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Its all about the Primaries when it comes to picking a (R) for President. The Republican nominee is almost picked before it ever gets to the Conservative South.
30 posted on 06/23/2009 8:37:49 PM PDT by A Texan (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I agree with that. The Dems have become smart in that regard, running pro 2A people like Heath Shuler in certain areas.

Which is exactly my point. In the Northeast we need more people like Peter Schiff to run, those who are intelligent on economic and fiscal issues and really don’t carry the “baggage” (as it is seen in the northeast) on social issues


31 posted on 06/24/2009 6:35:28 AM PDT by MadIsh32 (In order to be pro-market, sometimes you must be anti-big business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As long as conservatives are told to stay with the liberal run Republican party and work from within that apparaus they will continue to be voiceless in politics. Until conservatives pull away from the Whig party and form their own party they had better get used to being out of power.


32 posted on 06/24/2009 8:19:51 AM PDT by Ron H. (I believe in and practice the 4 Gs : God, Guns a Garden and Gold,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

“To be perfectly honest, those issues now find us in the minority.”

What issues? Life/abortion, where for the first time more people are poling a prolife than prochoice?
Shool choice, supported by most people?
Gay marriage, still opposed by most Americans?

“And really, something nobody looks at is the impact the Neo-Cons had on our movement”

Um, lots of people have used the ‘neo-con’ a foil for blame.
I tend to accuse the RINOs.

“Fi-cons have been pushed to the corner and forgotten about.”

Um, your proposal to let moderates run is a proposal to do exactly that - Ignore the fiscal conservatives. SO to me, you sound a bit confused and are taking potshots randomly at those who you think are to blame, using different labels ... which may or may not fit.

IMHO: You need to run real full-bore fiscal conservatives in some of these blue states to get the juices flowing again: Tax cuts, tort reform, school choice, welfare reform, and defense of traditional marriage are not unpopular items.

The problem with the moderate-GOPers is that they run on NOTHING except a bit of “Demo-lite” stuff. They dont stand up on moral issues and they dont stand up on fiscal issues, except on the margins. It’s too weak to get conservative voters who make up a plurality of voters EVEN IN BLUE STATES to get excited.

We need a big tent, but that big tent includes conservatives.
JMHO.


33 posted on 06/24/2009 3:51:04 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ron H.

“As long as conservatives are told to stay with the liberal run Republican party”

Not true. Your states RNC Committee man and -woman are not liberals.

“Until conservatives pull away from the Whig party and form their own party they had better get used to being out of power.”

Ah, yes “Divided we Stand” - splitting into unelectable third parties has only failed a dozen times before, the 13th time will surely be so *lucky* for us.


34 posted on 06/24/2009 3:53:37 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

“I bet you if Peter Schiff runs, he crushes Dodd in Connecticut.”

You bet wrong. Schiff hasnt even bothered to VOTE most of his adult life. I read a guy who interviewed him and said he was the worst candidate interview he EVER did. The guy has no clue about politics and campaigns in the sense of most people who are politically active .. A smart analyst but a poor candidate. Wish I had the link to share, I cant find it.


35 posted on 06/24/2009 3:58:23 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MadIsh32

“Which is exactly my point. In the Northeast we need more people like Peter Schiff to run, those who are intelligent on economic and fiscal issues and really don’t carry the “baggage” (as it is seen in the northeast) on social issues”

He’s anything BUT a moderate, he’s a RonPaul-type libertarian. BIG DIFF!


36 posted on 06/24/2009 3:59:32 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WOSG; MadIsh32

Let me add that a Schiff-type fiscal conservative would be the right type of candidate to run in NE in 2010.
(Although Schiff himself may have issues, see #35).
The economy and the lack of jobs will be issue #1 and we need strong people on that.

Romney won that way in 2002.


37 posted on 06/24/2009 4:03:11 PM PDT by WOSG (Why is Obama trying to bankrupt America with $16 trillion in spending over the next 4 years?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

And the Whig (and now the modern day Republican party as well) failed when they failed to represent the base as is happening today. Yes, a separate party from the failing country club Republican party is the best way left for conservatives today.


38 posted on 06/24/2009 4:34:46 PM PDT by Ron H. (I believe in and practice the 4 Gs : God, Guns a Garden and Gold,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson