Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Team of Researchers Blames Children's Films for Perpetuating "Heteronormativity"
LifeSiteNews.Com ^ | June 24, 2009 | Kathleen Gilbert

Posted on 06/26/2009 7:36:38 AM PDT by Wuli

ANN ARBOR, Michigan, June 24, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Researchers at the University of Michigan have concluded that the love stories told in classic Disney and other G-rated children's films - such as the Little Mermaid - are partially to blame for the pervasiveness of what they label "heteronormativity."

"Despite the assumption that children's media are free of sexual content, our analyses suggest that these media depict a rich and pervasive heterosexual landscape," wrote researchers Emily Kazyak and Karin Martin, in a report published in the latest issue of the Sociologists for Women in Society (SWS) publication Gender & Society.

Kazyak and Martin said they studied the role of heterosexual relationships in several of the highest-grossing G-rated films between 1990-2005.

The results, say the researchers, illustrate two ways that the children's films "construct heterosexuality": through "depictions of hetero-romantic love as exceptional, powerful, transformative, and magical," and "depictions of interactions between gendered bodies in which the sexiness of feminine characters is subjected to the gaze of masculine characters."

"Characters in love are surrounded by music, flowers, candles, magic, fire, balloons, fancy dresses, dim lights, dancing and elaborate dinners," the researchers observed. "Fireflies, butterflies, sunsets, wind and the beauty and power of nature often provide the setting for - and a link to the naturalness of - hetero-romantic love."

The SWS press release on the research blamed what they called the "old ideals" of romantic relationships, specifically those found the Brothers Grimm fairy tales, which in many instances inspired the films' storylines, for "such heavily gendered depictions and glorified portrayals of heterosexual relationships."

The team says the results point to heterosexuality achieving a "taken-for-granted status" "because hetero-romance is depicted as powerful."

"Both ordinary and exceptional constructions of heterosexuality work to normalize its status because it becomes difficult to imagine anything other than this form of social relationship or anyone outside of these bonds," they concluded.

"These films provide powerful portraits of a multifaceted and pervasive heterosexuality that likely facilitates the reproduction of heteronormativity."

The SWS press release concluded: "President Obama may have declared June to be Gay Pride Month, but entertainment for children therefore continues to perpetuate a less inclusive message, leaving those outside its confines with little to build their own dreams of happily ever after."

Sexuality expert Dr. Judith Reisman told LifeSiteNews.com (LSN) yesterday that the "politically correct" study reveals "the growing dominance of Heterophobia within academia and the spread of heterophobes among female professionals."

"Now, if the Ladies of the Sociology Society think pornography is becoming the heteronorm and that Disney is contributing to that form of what is really Heterophobia, they might have an argument," Reisman noted.

"However, the Ladies of the Sociology Society appear to favor Homoerotic child propaganda, as the current academic party line dictates."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: disney; gay; heteronormative; hollywood; homosexualagenda; radicalleft
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
"that the children's films "construct heterosexuality": through "depictions of hetero-romantic love"

Are these people idiots are what?

"construct"?????

How about "reflect".

If "Heteronormativity" is being "created" by the media, then what in the heck "created" it long before the media, before TV, before films, before radio, or even before the printing press???

Idiots.

1 posted on 06/26/2009 7:36:38 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wuli

We have officially entered The Twilight Zone.


2 posted on 06/26/2009 7:37:44 AM PDT by ponygirl ("Strange things are afoot at the Circle K.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

“Heteronormativity” vs. “Normal-Phobia”(or being queer)...


3 posted on 06/26/2009 7:39:34 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

This has got to be from “The Onion.”


4 posted on 06/26/2009 7:40:19 AM PDT by lakertaker (Libertarian Party since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

This has got to be from “The Onion.”


5 posted on 06/26/2009 7:40:20 AM PDT by lakertaker (Libertarian Party since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Oh doctor, please help me! I suffer from being normal! Please doctor, make me some freak.


6 posted on 06/26/2009 7:40:42 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Look at the other side of the process, The communists had a “construct Patriotism” that a person's children would turn them in for crimes against communism. We now have a “construct global warming” that has kids against common sense and fighting the Establishment.
7 posted on 06/26/2009 7:42:21 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Let us hope and pray...that Disney always seeks to reflect “Heteronormativity”...in perpetuity!


8 posted on 06/26/2009 7:42:53 AM PDT by NCDragon (If you can't stand behind the troops, try standing in front of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
They might be lesbians...

Emily Kazyak: and Karin Martin:

(cya: not that there's anything wrong with that)

9 posted on 06/26/2009 7:43:54 AM PDT by the_devils_advocate_666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

It’s stuff like this that makes psychologists and the field of psychology a running joke.


10 posted on 06/26/2009 7:44:53 AM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

Oh the HORROR!

Normal and natural behavior is promoted???

Disgusting.
/s

These people actually get paid money to develope these idiotic papers?????
They should be sent to Planet Stupid on the next shuttle....


11 posted on 06/26/2009 7:45:42 AM PDT by Adder (Proudly ignoring Zero since 1-20-09!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666

Most likely. They can’t get dates so they have to ruin it for everyone else.

Meanwhile the Chinese build their weaponry and continue to push and push to see what they can get away with.

I highly doubt that the Chinese researchers are getting upset over sexual preferences.


12 posted on 06/26/2009 7:45:55 AM PDT by Niuhuru (Anger means your spirit isn't broken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: randog

Is ir any wonder children are growing up the way they are?

Look at the video games.

Look at the TV shows like with that sissy Barney the dinosaur, Spongebob Squarepants and those Teletubbies.

Bring back more shows like DAVEY AND GOLIATH that actually teach kids and children good ideals and principles.


13 posted on 06/26/2009 7:47:30 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Note this material was generated with tax money at a govt-run school.

These folks are entitled to their opinions, but I can't fathom Michigan taxpayers - the few left - thinking this is a good use of their money.

14 posted on 06/26/2009 7:49:02 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_devils_advocate_666
I was half expecting to see two Pete Rose look-a-likes in flannel shirts.

Even if they might not be physically ugly, their ideas are.

You do get a strong sense of "we do it, so it must be okay" in their study.

15 posted on 06/26/2009 7:51:49 AM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

I had never thought much about it,
but then I guess a fish doesn’t really notice the water.

But this explains why I’m attracted to people with breasts and vaginas who aren’t ugly or draw flies.

It’s Walt Disney’s fault. Too late for me, too late for my kids.


16 posted on 06/26/2009 7:53:24 AM PDT by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

No one is born as stupid as the authors: to be this dumb, you really have to go to college and learn it.


17 posted on 06/26/2009 7:53:47 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lakertaker

Where have you been? I was a graduate student in the social “sciences” once (I got better). This would have been considered par for the course ~1992. Nowadays, it’s probably thought of as old hat at the university.

In the near future, look for calls for “equal time” for sodomite relationships in kids movies.


18 posted on 06/26/2009 7:54:16 AM PDT by Poe White Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl

Yep. You just couldn’t make this stuff up in a thousand years.


19 posted on 06/26/2009 8:00:26 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

This was posted several days ago.


20 posted on 06/26/2009 8:02:54 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson