Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breakthrough on the Authorship of Obama's 'Dreams' !!!!!
American Thinker ^ | 6/28/09 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 06/27/2009 10:34:36 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 501-516 next last
To: Seeing More Clearly Now
“He was a nobody when it was decided by somebody that not one, but two books would be written under the name of this nobody and that a ghostwriter would do it. That’s just plain weird.”

It's not weird at all. Obama was groomed from childhood to play the destructive role in American history he is playing today. His education, his career (such as it was), and his books were all part of a coordinated effort to make us poorer at home and weaker abroad.

I have very little doubt that Ayers wrote his first book just as one of the Communist professors at Harvard Law wrote his law review writing competition note when he was a 2L. Obama didn't just happen, he was manufactured. The man is a moron. Somebody crafted the image of a great intellectual for him. Jack Cashill has given us some interesting insight into how part of that crafting was done.

That said, it doesn't really matter how Obama came to be. The icon has been created and there is no way to debunk it now. The Obama that millions voted for doesn't exist and never did, but his supporters will never acknowledge that any more than the Iranian Mullahs will ever repudiate the idea that Mohamed was Allah's prophet.

It is interesting to look at the tracks that Obama’s creators left behind. In the end, however, they don't matter. We have to focus on fighting the monster not on exposing how he came to be. If Bill Clinton taught us anything it should be this: There is no political gain to be gotten from laying bare the ugly truths behind leftist mythology.

161 posted on 06/28/2009 6:28:38 AM PDT by fluffdaddy (Is anyone else missing Fred Thompson about now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: mylife
This isnt journalism. Its an aside designed to make Cashill money

I'm not a fan of Cashill, but how much money, in round numbers, do you think he can make peddling this story?

ML/NJ

162 posted on 06/28/2009 6:31:32 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE; maggief; SE Mom; hoosiermama; Miss Didi; Faith

PING!!


163 posted on 06/28/2009 6:31:47 AM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Wrong. New, overwhelming research.


164 posted on 06/28/2009 6:31:54 AM PDT by Jack Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freekitty

As I recall, there was a big hoopla about Hillary having a ghostwriter for “Village”, too. Nobody cared. I don’t think anyone cares about ghostwriters, and assumes that everyone uses them. Ayers was the ghostwriter, and Obama lied about it. Shocking. /s


165 posted on 06/28/2009 6:33:46 AM PDT by erkyl (We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office --Aesop (~550 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
At one time, Monica was a conspiracy theory. ;o)

And she distracted you, and a few more people, from discussing the death of Ron Brown. Even the black loudmouths were beginning to ask questions. She also diverted attention from seven figure bribes being accepted by the then President, and the death of his "best friend."

You were had.

ML/NJ

166 posted on 06/28/2009 6:38:20 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Of course BHO did not write/author the books.

The books were written to help him in his political goals by the Marxist Ayers. Ayers knew he could never accomplish his goals himself so BHO became his tool.

167 posted on 06/28/2009 6:44:51 AM PDT by Dustbunny ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. " Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erkyl

Just imagine the power Ayers has over Obama if this is true.


168 posted on 06/28/2009 6:45:18 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: kabar

I don’t have to imagine. I have always known. Any rational, thinking human being could connect the dots during the campaign. Why is this news? It confirms they had a relationship. Didn’t we already know that? Nobody cared.


169 posted on 06/28/2009 6:49:33 AM PDT by erkyl (We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office --Aesop (~550 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

To add to your excellent post, here is how two men a generation apart in age were in the same place at the same time. Ayers evolved from street demonstrations to undergroud experiences to deciding that controlling early education was the best path for his Revolution. I agree with you that student Obama came into Ayers, and probably, Stanley Dunham’s life during the early ‘80s.

From Wikipedia:
After leaving the underground, he (Ayers) earned an M.Ed from Bank Street College in Early Childhood Education (1984)[age 40], an M.Ed from Teachers College, Columbia University in Early Childhood Education (1987) and an Ed.D from Teachers College, Columbia University in Curriculum and Instruction (1987).

*****

Obama graduated from Columbia in 1983 but did not move to Chicago until 1985.


170 posted on 06/28/2009 6:52:18 AM PDT by maica (Politics is not about facts. it is about what politicians can get people to believe. - Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: erkyl

No, if true, this casts a more ominous view of the relationship. And Ayers can hold this authorship over Obama’s head for whatever purpose. Ayers has the power to destroy Obama politically.


171 posted on 06/28/2009 6:56:28 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: pissant
The marxist fraud has been NAILED!!!

I wish that were correct, but unfortunately it's not. Obama has yet to be nailed on anything. Oh, the evidence is all there, and that is probably what you are referring to when you say that he has been nailed -- in the theoretical sense of there being quite a bit of evidence against him, yes he has. But in the real sense of actually being challenged, indicted and convicted -- you know, actually "nailed"? That eventuality is, unfortunately, as distant as it has always been.

The birth certificate issue is still out there. Nothing substantial has come of it. The Chrysler takeover, which violates the rule of law as it pertains to bankruptcy proceedings, is out there. Nothing will come of that, either.

Then there is this Ayers-ghost-writing issue. I am afraid that all of this will amount to nothing more than some interesting writing-style analysis by a right-winger who is seen as flogging a dead horse. I fervently wish that this issue -- or ANY of these issues -- would amount to much, much more than that (in other words, get the legal attention they deserve), and Obama would be truly "nailed." But I've already seen enough and heard enough to be absolutely jaded about the possibility that anything will actually come of this.

I really hope I'm wrong. Maybe, like the story of the Mafia's Teflon Don, patience will be a virtue in this. But I'm getting tired of waiting for anything to actually stick to this Obama guy. At least the Teflon Don was just doing racketeering and the normal Mafia stuff. Obama's actions are, of course, much more damaging and far-reaching, affecting not only the citizens of this country but the planet as a whole. And I can't wait 3.5 more years or more for him to finally be outed and convicted for his crimes of fraud. It will be too late; the damage will have been done. It already has been done to a large extent, just within six months.

So I wait. And call congressmen. And wait some more. Hoping for the day that Obama is, truly, NAILED.

172 posted on 06/28/2009 6:58:35 AM PDT by RepublitarianRoger2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Seriously, each writer has “chords” and “progressions” as unique as a guitarist. Just as you can pick out your favorite band’s sound even from an unheard piece of music, a writer’s little details do not lie. Bill Ayers and Barack Obama are two distinct people and cannot write that closely alike in the LITTLE things, the unconscious things. It’s not possible.
100% Correct.

That 'writing style' even goes for FReepers. Every FReeper has their own style(1). After a while you can tell who posted a comment without seeing his/her screen name. Especially holds true for long time FReepers.

And as to guitarists, ditto. Just watch a YouTube Video of a BB King, Eric Clapton duet. They're both playing the same song but BB is doing it his way and Clapton is doing it his way (inserting their 'signature' licks).

(1) When I post at Huffie or DU I have to conscientiously try 'not to be me'. Eveb though I'm using different screen names, gotta be careful of my style. Orrrrr using 'gotta' like I just did :-)

173 posted on 06/28/2009 7:06:39 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Ping for later


174 posted on 06/28/2009 7:07:17 AM PDT by Batman11 (Chicago, Land of Lincoln who freed the slaves and Land of Obama who enslaved the free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Naw. America yawns. Flips on the boob tube to Fox Reality Channel and veg out with a cold one. No worries. Don’t care. Gov check’s in the mail.


175 posted on 06/28/2009 7:14:55 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (If it looks like Marx, sounds like Stalin, IT IS PROBABLY OBAMA & the Dimocrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
[Like most contributors, he prefers to remain anonymous. The media punishment that Joe the Plumber received has much to do with this nearly universal reticence.]

Only one step removed from what dissidents in Iran receive for questioning their government.

176 posted on 06/28/2009 7:15:29 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government -- Thomas Payne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane

Has anyone been able to read his college papers? Have they been researched, not for plagiarism, but for authorship?


177 posted on 06/28/2009 7:17:13 AM PDT by huldah1776 ( Worthy is the Lamb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: mylife; pissant
If the raping of America before your eyes is secondary to this kind of BS we are lost.

Strawman. Following and commenting on this story doesn't make the greater issues of the day "secondary". It is not "Either/Or" but rather "Both/And". We should use every arrow in our quiver against this Marxist liar. It's a war. Tea parties and intellectual analysis. I'd say your anti-Cashill bias is clouding your thinking.

178 posted on 06/28/2009 7:20:53 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Look, the people of this country have been had. That much is clear by now. Obama is a liar, a fraud, a phony, a tyrant. He spends millions trying to conceal his college records, his long vault birth certificate, etc. He openly is above the rule of law in his quest to turn the country into a communist utopia. And the links between himself and all his radical pals are well established. That he would have Bill Ayers write a book for him is a near certain possibility. Cashill has obviously put a lot of effort into putting together some evidence that is beyond compelling. Some of us realize what’s going on but until the MSM does, we may as well be shouting from the rooftops.


179 posted on 06/28/2009 7:22:14 AM PDT by NoobRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Ayers has the power to destroy Obama politically.

&&&&&&

Excellent point. Aren’t federal background checks of any potential employee needing secret clearances mostly about items in a person’s history that could be sources of blackmail? (I know elected officials do not get the FBI scrutiny but all State Dept employees, for example, do get them.)


180 posted on 06/28/2009 7:23:41 AM PDT by maica (Politics is not about facts. it is about what politicians can get people to believe. - Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 501-516 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson