1 posted on
06/30/2009 4:44:16 AM PDT by
Kaslin
evolutionism, a religion, who would have thunk it...???
2 posted on
06/30/2009 4:57:51 AM PDT by
raygunfan
To: Kaslin
Making a Monkey Out of DarwinI guess it's only fair to reverse the debate. The general point of contention so far has been the issue of making Darwin out of a monkey.
To: Kaslin
The best from Pat I’ve read in a long while.
5 posted on
06/30/2009 5:15:08 AM PDT by
Tribune7
(Better to convert enemies to allies than to destroy them)
To: Kaslin
Buchanon did this? He's a better analyst than to confound "Social Darwinism" with "Darwin".
I think he's not being careful in his reviews of the pieces his hired writers do for him.
Guy's getting old or something.
6 posted on
06/30/2009 6:01:00 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Kaslin
The strong survive, the weak don’t.
Cept for times when the socialist dems are in charge.
7 posted on
06/30/2009 6:28:10 AM PDT by
misterrob
(A society that burdens future generations with debt can not be considered moral or just)
To: Kaslin
I think Pat is worried that Christians might have evolved from the Jews.
9 posted on
06/30/2009 3:27:59 PM PDT by
Paradox
(When the left have no one to villainize, they'll turn on each other.)
To: Kaslin
Scopes never taught evolution If Scopes never taught evolution, why was he charged with it? Moreover, if he had, would the outcome of the trial have been any different?
10 posted on
06/30/2009 3:34:13 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: Kaslin
If evolution is such settled science, why is it still called a theory?
13 posted on
06/30/2009 9:26:08 PM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all. -- Texas Eagle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson