Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius Valerius
I just don’t think the debates back up the contention that the bill of rights was intended to apply to the states. The history just doesn’t bear it out.

The words in the amendments are pretty darn clear. The suggestion that the Framers didn't say what they intended to say rings pretty hollow with me given their incredible precision in all these other documents they left around. It is only "by words multiplied" that anyone could have a different interpretation here.

ML/NJ

17 posted on 07/01/2009 1:36:34 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ml/nj
The suggestion that the Framers didn't say what they intended

They said precisely what they intended, which is why the amendments that would have bound the states were voted down in Congress. I mean, this debate was had in Congress, and the effort to extend amendments to the states was defeated.

21 posted on 07/01/2009 2:12:14 PM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson